3 Tentara Turki Tewas di Turki Tenggara

Tentara Turki menunggu di sebuah pos pemeriksaan di kota Diyarbakir Turki tenggara , 26 Juli 2015. (Foto: AFP)

Serangan yang dilakukan oleh Partai Buruh Kurdistan (PKK) telah menewaskan tiga tentara Turki di tenggara negara itu, seroang tentara mengatakan.

Tentara mengatakan bahwa “tiga … personil – satu petugas, satu bintara dan satu sipil – tewas, dalam serangan PKK di provinsi Sirnak, Kamis (30/7/15).

Konvoi militer diserang di distrik Akcay di Sinrak, yang berbatasan dengan Suriah dan Irak, tentara menambahkan.

Ia menambahkan bahwa “drone, helikopter tempur dan pasukan komando” dikirim ke tempat kejadian.
Seorang petempur PKK juga tewas dalam bentrokan pada Kamis di Sirnak, kata militer.

Insiden itu terjadi akibat kekerasan baru antara pasukan Turki dan PKK, yang anggotanya telah terlibat lama dalam militansi di Turki tenggara.

Rabu malam, seorang polisi dan seorang warga sipil tewas di kota Diyarbakir Turki tenggara dalam serangan yang dipersalahkan ke PKK.

Foto menunjukkan Jet tempur Angkatan Udara Turki membawa rudal saat lepas landas dari Pangkalan Udara Incirlik di kota Adana Turki selatan, 29 Juli 2015. (Foto: AFP)

Turki baru-baru ini meluncurkan serangan udara terhadap basis PKK di Irak utara serta posisi teroris Takfiri ISIS di Suriah setelah serangan bom mematikan yang menewaskan 32 orang tewas di kota barat daya Suruç, di seberang perbatasan kota Kobani Suriah.

Tindakan baru Turki terhadap militan ISIS ini akibat sebelumnya Ankara dianggap sebagai salah satu pendukung utama militan yang berjuang untuk menggulingkan pemerintah Presiden Suriah Bashar al-Assad sejak 2011.[]

(MahdiNews/ABNS)

Pemimpin Kurdi: Serangan Anti-ISIS Turki Hanya “Show”

Selahattin Demirtas, wakio ketua Partai Demokrat Rakyat Turki (Foto: AFP)

Pemimpin puncak partai Kurdi Turki mengecam sebagai tidak lebih dari sebuah “show” penggerebegan yang dilakuakn polisi anti-teror Turki dan serangan militer Turki terhadap militan Takfiri ISIS di Suriah.

Dalam wawancara dengan AFP, Kamis (30/7/15), Selahattin Demirtas, wakil ketua Partai Rakyat Demokratik (HDP), menuduh pemerintah Presiden Turki Recep Tayyip Erdogan menggunakan klaim serangan udara anti-ISIS untuk menutup pemboman terhadap posisi Partai Pekerja Kurdistan (PKK).

“Serangkaian serangan udara yang diluncurkan oleh Turki terhadap ” terget ISIS” hanya pertunjukan saja dan itu sudah berakhir,” kata Demirtas, menambahkan bahwa tersangka pemboman telah ditahan dalam operasi “show” dan sebagian besar dari mereka dibebaskan. ”

Turki baru-baru ini meluncurkan serangan udara ke basis PKK di Irak utara serta posisi ISIS di Suriah setelah serangan bom mematikan yang menewaskan 32 orang tewas di barat daya kota Suruç, di seberang perbatasan kota Kobani antara Kurdi Suriah.

Pesawat tempur Angkatan Udara Turki dengan rudalnya lepas landas dari Pangkalan Udara Incirlik, di kota Turki selatan Adana, 28 Juli 2015. (Foto: AFP)

Ankara juga meluncurkan operasi penangkapan menyusul pemboman 20 Juli di Suruç, yang diduga dilakukan gerilyawan Takfiri ISIS. Namun, hanya sekitar sepersepuluh dari mereka yang ditahan dalam penggerebekan polisi ISIS terkait pemboman dan sisanyadi bebaskan.

Ankara diyakini sebagai salah satu pendukung utama kelompok teroris melawan Presiden Suriah Bashar al-Assad sejak 2011, dengan laporan yang menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah Turki secara aktif melatih dan mempersenjatai militan yang beroperasi di Suriah, dan juga memfasilitasi perjalanan yang aman teroris asing dari dan ke daerah yang dilanda krisis.

Proses perdamaian Ankara-PKK
Di tempat lain dalam sambutannya, wakil ketua HDP menuduh pemerintahan Turki menyebakan proses perdamaian antara Ankara dan PKK “kedalam krisis yang mendalam” yang menyamakan ISIS dengan militer PKK.

“(proses perdamaian) ini akan diselesaikan,” sebelum serangan udara Turki, kata Demirtas, menambahkan bahwa Erdogan berusaha untuk menyamakan PKK dan ISIS.”

Pejuang Partai Pekerja Kurdistan (PKK).

Komentar itu muncul setelah gencatan senjata yang berlaku sejak 2013, dinyatakan batal oleh PKK baru-baru ini menyusul serangan udara Turki terhadap kelompok itu, namun serangan ini kemungkinan mencapai genjatan senjata dalam waktu dekat.

Kekalahan Pemilu AKP Erdogan
Demirtas juga mencatat bahwa Erdogan sebagai mendalangi krisis dalam upayanya untuk meningkatkan kekuatannya sendiri setelah ia gagal mendapatkan hasil yang diinginkan dalam pemilihan parlemen di negara itu.

Presiden Turki Recep Tayyip Erdogan 
Partai Keadilan dan Pembangunan Erdogan (AKP) “menyeret negara ke dalam situasi konflik, ia berusaha membalas dendam atas kehilangan mayoritas pendukungnya dalam pemilihan bulan Juni,” katanya.

Bulan lalu, AKP Erdogan juga gagal mendapatkan mayoritas mutlak di parlemen untuk yang pertama kalinya sejak ia berkuasa pada 2002. []

(MahdiNews/ABNS)

Serangan Udara Baru Turki terhadap Kelompok Partai Pekerja Kurdistan (PKK)

Jet tempur F-16 milik Angkatan Udara Turki diambil 21 Juni 2015

Pesawat-pesawat tempur Turki telah meluncurkan serangan udara baru di Irak utara menargetkan kelompok Partai Pekerja Kurdistan (PKK).

Jet tempur F-16 lepas landas dari pangkalan udara di Diyarbakir selatan Turki pada Minggu malam (26/7/15) menyerang posisi PKK di Gunung Qandil, di wilayah semi-otonom Kurdistan Irak, media bahasa Turki melaporkan.

“Sekitar pukul 9:00 (1800 GMT), pesawat Turki mulai membom beberapa posisi kami di dua daerah di utara Dohuk dan utara Arbil”, Bakhtiar Dogan, juru bicara PKK di Irak mengatakan kepada AFP.

Tidak ada laporan segera tentang tingkat kerusakan atau jumlah korban.

Serangan jet Turki ke Irak dan Suriah, yang dilakukan Jumat, sedikitnya menewaskan 32 orang menyusul ledakan bom “teroris” di barat daya Suruç Turki awal pekan ini. Serangan itu dikaitkan dengan ISIS, kelompok teroris yang mengontrol daerah di Irak dan Suriah.

Ankara menyalahkan PKK atas serangkaian serangan terhadap pasukan keamanan dalam beberapa hari terakhir.

Serangan militer Turki arahkan untuk menyerang posisi ISIS di Suriah dan PKK di Irak utara.

Pemerintah Turki diyakini sebagai salah satu pendukung utama kelompok teroris melawan Presiden Suriah Bashar al-Assad sejak 2011, dimana laporan menunjukkan bahwa Ankara aktif melatih dan mempersenjatai militan yang beroperasi di Suriah, dan juga memfasilitasi perjalanan yang aman bagi teroris asing yang hendak ke wilayah yang dilanda krisis. []

(MahdiNews/ABNS)

Putri Erdogan Rawat Militan Takfiri ISIS yang Cedera di Rumah Sakit Rahasia

Sumeyye Erdogan, putri Presiden Turki Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Putri Presiden Turki Recep Tayyip Erdogan telah menjalankan rumah sakit “rahasia” tempat para militan Takfiri ISIS yang terluka mendapat perawatan, seorang perawat mengatakan.

Perawat, yang berbicara dengan syarat anonim, mengungkapkan bahwa rumah sakit militer rahasia, yang dipimpin oleh Sumeyye Erdogan, terletak di kota Sanliurfa tenggara Turki, Global Research, lembaga penelitian dan media independen, melaporkan.

Perawat berusia 34 tahun itu mengungkapkan bahwa rumah sakit melayani perawatan medis untuk militan Takfiri yang terluka yang dibawa dari Suriah.

Perawat lebih lanjut mengatakan dia telah bekerja di rumah sakit selama tujuh minggu, menambahkan, “Hampir setiap hari beberapa truk militer Turki membawa puluhan militan ISIS terluka parah, ke rumah sakit rahasia kami.”
“Kami harus mempersiapkan kamar operasi dan dokter untuk membantu sesuai prosedur,” tambahnya.

“Saya diberi gaji rendah $ 7.500, tetapi mereka tidak mengetahui agama saya. Sebenarnya saya penganut Alawi dan sejak Erdogan menjadi kepala negara, sistemnya mengabaikan minoritas Alawi, “tambah perawat.
Akibat sikap pemerintah Turki pada keyakinannya menjadi alasan ia meninggalkan rumah sakit.

Perawat mengatakan bahwa ia telah melihat putri Erdogan beberapa kali di lokasi rumah sakit sebelum keputusannya untuk meninggalkan pusat pelayanan medis itu.

Perawat itu juga menyesali setelah ia bergabung dengan rumah sakit itu dan mengatakan dia sekarang takut ditangkap oleh polisi dan intelejen Turki.

Putri Erdogan sebelumnya telah mengumumkan rencananya untuk melakukan kunjungan ke kota Mosul di Irak, yang saat ini berada dalam pengepungan kelompok Takfiri ISIS, untuk membantu militan di kota. Irak telah dilanda aksi terorisme oleh kelompok Takfiri sejak pada Juni 2014.

Pemerintah Erdogan telah menjadi salah satu pendukung utama kelompok teroris melawan pemerintah Assad sejak 2011, dengan laporan mengatakan bahwa Ankara aktif melatih dan mempersenjatai militan di Suriah dan memfasilitasi perjalanan yang aman bagi teroris ke negara itu.

Pada tanggal 12 Juni, surat kabar Zaman Turki juga mengungkapkan bahwa Ankara memungkinkan teroris ISIS untuk bebas berjalan di jalan-jalan di daerah perbatasan Akcakale di Sanliurfa.
(MahdiNews/ABNS)

Ancaman Hizbullah ke Rezim Zionis : Habisi Jutaan Warga Israel

Pemimpin gerakan Hizbullah Lebanon, Hasan Nashrullah, mengeluarkan ancaman mengerikan terhadap rezim Zionis Israel. Kelompok itu akan menghabisi jutaan warga Israel jika Lebanon diserang. 
 
Ancaman itu muncul dalam sebuah pidato Nashrullah di stasiun televisi sebagai respons atas seruan pejabat militer Israel untuk menyerang wilayah-wilayah sipil di Lebanon jika terjadi konfrontasi dengan Hizbullah di masa depan.

”Jika mereka mengancam untuk menewaskan 1,5 juta warga Lebanon, maka perlawanan Islam di Lebanon (Hizbullah) akan menggantinya dengan jutaan warga Israel,” kata Nashrullah. ”Kami tidak takut perang atau ancaman,” katanya lagi.

”Jika Anda menganggap bahwa kita sibuk di Suriah, maka Anda salah. Karena ini tidak mengubah apa pun dalam cara kita berurusan dengan musuh kita,” lanjut Nashrullah, seperti dilansir Al Arabiya, semalam (5/6/2015).

Selama lebih dari dua tahun, kelompok Hizbullah telah berperang di Suriah untuk membantu pasukan rezim Presiden Bashar al-Assad yang ingin digulingkan pemberontak.

Ancaman Hizbullah itu bermula dari komentar pejabat Israel kepada wartawan pada 13 Mei 2015. Pejabat itu menyebut semua desa di Lebanon adalah basis militer, di mana di desa-desa itu terdapat roket yang mampu menghantam Israel.

”Setiap (desa) adalah basis militer. Lain kali jika kita harus perang dengan Hizbullah, kita harus menyerang masing-masing dari target tersebut, dan kami berharap penduduk tidak akan ada,” kata pejabat itu yang menolak diidentifikasi.

[Sumber: Sindo News]

Analisa ABNA atas Berita Arrahmah.com: Pesawat Tempur Suriah Menggempur Antrian Warga Sipil, Benarkah?

Kalau berita Arrahmah.com benar menyebutkan rudal-rudal udara ditembakkan oleh pesawat tempur Mig-21 dan menewaskan sampai 300 orang semestinya akan tampak kerusakan berat pada gedung-gedung di lokasi kejadian. Namun kita tidak melihat adanya kerusakan berat itu. Bangunan sekitar gedung yang disebut menjual roti tersebut tetap utuh dan tidak ada tanda-tanda bekas kena rudal atau bom sama sekali.

Menurut Kantor Berita ABNA, Arrahmah.com menukil dari media-media pihak anti Bashar Asad menyebutkan, "Pesawat tempur rezim Nushairiyah Suriah melakukan serangan biadab dengan membom antrian warga sipil muslim yang hendak membeli roti di kota Halfaya, propinsi Hamah pada Ahad (23/12/2012) pagi. Serangan tersebut disebutkan menewaskan lebih dari 300 warga sipil."

"Lebih dari 1.000 orang telah mengantri di sebuah pabrik roti kota Halfaya saat rudal-rudal udara ditembakkan oleh pesawat tempur Mig-21 rezim Suriah pada Ahad. Kekurangan bahan bakar dan tepung telah membuat produksi roti tidak menentu di seluruh negeri, dan orang sering menunggu berjam-jam untuk membeli roti. Para korban termasuk anak-anak dan kaum perempuan." Demikian lansir Arrahmah.com

Arrahmah juga menuliskan, "Mayat-mayat ratusan anak-anak, wanita dan pria yang menunggu giliran pembelian roti berserakan di mana-mana. Sebagiannya tertimbun oleh reruntuhan bangunan toko roti. Puluhan warga sipil yang selamat dan mujahidin berlarian untuk melakukan evakuasi. Darah dan tulang belulang korban berceceran di jalanan."

Namun video yang dipublish Arrahmah.com tersebut tidak luput dari kritik karena adanya beberapa keganjilan yang tampak dari video tersebut. Berikut redaksi ABNA merangkum diantara keganjilan tersebut:

1.      Video tersebut sama sekali tidak menunjukkan adanya banyak korban dari kalangan perempuan dan anak-anak. Yang tampak dari video hanyalah mayat-mayat dari kalangan laki-laki itupun tertimbun tumpukan batu dan dipenuhi tanah. Korban perempuan hanya terlihat pada detik 58 itupun sementara di gendong dengan keadaan masih selamat. Seorang anak perempuan berlari kecil dibelakangnya.

2.      Adanya tumpukan potongan material dan tanah di depan gedung tampak sangat ganjil, sebab tertumpuk di satu tempat dan tidak tampak berserakan. Keadaan mayat yang dipenuhi pasir juga patut dipertanyakan, pasir itu berasal dari mana, sebab jalan didepan gedung masih tampak utuh, tidak terlihat tanda-tanda kerusakan sama sekali. Kalau berasal dari dinding gedung yang runtuh, juga dinding gedung tersebut masih utuh bahkan warnanya sangat berbeda dengan tumpukan batu yang menutupi para mayat.

3.      Pada menit 1:23 ada mayat yang dikeluarkan dari gedung. Mengapa bisa ada mayat dalam gedung sementara gedung tersebut masih utuh? Bukankah yang dibom oleh pesawat rezim Suriah adalah antrian? Kalau bom juga mengenai gedung sehingga juga menyebabkan korban tewas dalam gedung, mengapa tidak ada tanda-tanda kerusakan sama sekali pada gedung tersebut?.

4.      Pada menit 1:36 seorang laki-laki berjaket cokelat dan bersyal hitam, tampak sengaja menampakkan diri di depan kamera, melihat kekanan dan kekiri dengan tubuh mengarah ke kamera, sesuatu yang sangat jarang terjadi di sebuah tempat pasca terjadi ledakan. Kebanyakan orang-orang yang juga tampak dari video tidak tahu hendak melakukan apa. Sementara mayat menumpuk di depan mata mereka dan sewajarnya mesti segera dievakuasi. Lihat pada detik ke 50, tampak seorang pemuda menyeret kakinya yang luka, justru tidak mendapat pertolongan dan bantuan apa-apa oleh orang-orang yang berdiri dan berjalan di sekitarnya.

5.      Pada menit 2:10, dari tumpukan mayat depan gedung yang tertutupi reruntuhan bangunan tampak satu mayat yang nyaris telanjang dengan hanya mengenakan celana dalam biru. Apakah logis seseorang ikut antrian untuk membeli roti hanya dengan mengenakan celana dalam?. Kalau dikatakan pakaiannya hangus terbakar, mengapa pada mayat tersebut tidak tampak adanya bekas kebakaran sama sekali?. Keganjilan lain akan tampak sangat nyata jika melihat sama sekali tidak ada tumpukan mayat tersebut yang tampak menderita luka bakar atau tubuhnya tidak dalam keadaan masih utuh. Kalau memang kesemuanya itu terbunuh karena serangan  rudal-rudal udara ditembakkan oleh pesawat tempur Mig-21 mestinya yang terlihat adalah potongan-potongan tubuh ataupun mayat-mayat yang hangus terbakar, bukan nyaris telanjang dengan menyisakan celana dalam.

6.      Jika melihat tumpukan mayat di depan gedung, sekilas kita akan memperkirakan jumlah korban paling banter 10 atau 20 orang. Namun laporan peristiwa tersebut menyebutkan korban tewas sebanyak 300 orang. Ar Rahmah menulis, "Mayat-mayat ratusan anak-anak, wanita dan pria yang menunggu giliran pembelian roti berserakan di mana-mana." Pertanyaannya, kemana kesemua 300 mayat yang berserakan tersebut? Mengapa tidak tampak dalam video? Mayat yang tampak diluar tumpukan tidak sampai 10 mayat bukan ratusan? Kalau tidak tampak dalam video dari mana ar Rahmah mengetahui adanya ratusan mayat yang berserakan itu?.   

7.      Kalau berita ar Rahmah benar menyebutkan rudal-rudal udara ditembakkan oleh pesawat tempur Mig-21dan menewaskan sampai 300 orang semestinya akan tampak kerusakan berat pada gedung-gedung di lokasi kejadian. Namun kita tidak melihat adanya kerusakan berat itu. Bangunan sekitar gedung yang disebut menjual roti tersebut tetap utuh dan tidak ada tanda-tanda bekas kena rudal atau bom sama sekali.

8.      Dan yang lebih meyakinkan lagi bahwa video tersebut rekayasaa adalah tidak tampak kepanikan atau ketakutan dari warga sama sekali. Kalau memang serangan itu berasal dari pesawat udara, semestinya warga akan tampak berlarian, menyelamatkan diri dengan kemungkinan akan terjadi serangan udara susulan. Namun hal itu tidak tampak dalam video berdurasi 3:40 menit tersebut. Lalu lintas masih tampak normal. Bahkan diantara yang berlarian, masih ada yang tampak berjalan santai. Sepanjang video terdengar suara sirine yang tidak jelas. Apakah itu sirine ambulance atau sirine mobil patroli polisi atau sirine tanda bahaya?.

Berikut link berita dan video dari situs Arrahmah.com tersebut. Selamat menganalisa.

http://arrahmah.com/read/2012/12/24/25651-video-serangan-udara-pengecut-rezim-suriah-membantai-lebih-dari-300-warga-sipil-muslim-di-kota-halfaya.html

==================

Video serangan udara pengecut rezim Suriah membantai lebih dari 300 warga sipil muslim di kota Halfaya 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnCsDjCfL_4

HAMAH (Arrahmah.com) – Pesawat tempur rezim Nushairiyah Suriah melakukan serangan biadab dengan membom antrian warga sipil muslim yang hendak membeli roti di kota Halfaya, propinsi Hamah pada Ahad (23/12/2012) pagi.

Laporan awal pada Ahad siang yang dilansir oleh aktivis kemanusiaan dalam kota Halfa menyebutkan sedikitnya 90 warga sipil gugur dan 300 warga lainnya luka berat oleh serangan pengecut tersebut. Namun laporan terbaru yang dilansir oleh kantor berita Koordinator Revolusi Lokal di Ghautah Timur dan Ugarits News pada Ahad malam menyebutkan korban gugur telah melebihi 300 warga sipil.

Lebih dari 1.000 orang telah mengantri di sebuah pabrik roti kota Halfaya saat rudal-rudal udara ditembakkan oleh pesawat tempur Mig-21 rezim Suriah pada Ahad.  Kekurangan bahan bakar dan tepung telah membuat produksi roti tidak menentu di seluruh negeri, dan orang sering menunggu berjam-jam untuk membeli roti.  Para korban termasuk anak-anak dan kaum perempuan.

Mayat-mayat ratusan anak-anak, wanita dan pria yang menunggu giliran pembelian roti berserakan di mana-mana. Sebagiannya tertimbun oleh reruntuhan bangunan toko roti. Puluhan warga sipil yang selamat dan mujahidin berlarian untuk melakukan evakuasi. Darah dan tulang belulang korban berceceran di jalanan.

Pekik kepedihan dan histeris melanda kota Halfaya. Ya Allah, ya Allah, seru warga yang tak mampu menahan kepedihan atas kebiadaban rezim Suriah.
“Lihatlah wahai bangsa Arab! Lihatlah wahai Dunia!” teriak seorang wartawan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnCsDjCfL_4

===========================================

(Source)

Beritakan Kekejaman Assad, Arrahmah Bohong lagi

Arrahmah, kembali dipreteli kebohongannya dalam membuat berita.

Menurut Kantor Berita ABNA, Arrahmah, sudah berkali-kali dipreteli kebohongannya dalam membuat berita. Jika ditelusuri pemberitaan media ini mengenai kasus penyerangan sekolah oleh Taliban di Pakistan, hanya ada satu berita, dan itu juga menyakitkan, dengan aksi yang terang-terangan biadab itu,  tetap saja Arrahmah menyebut Taliban dengan sebutan Mujahid, dan memberitakan bahwa sang Mujahid Taliban terpaksa melakukan itu. Jadi bukan karena keinginan sendiri, tetapi menewaskan hampir 140 warga sipil yang tidak bersalah, kebanyakan dari mereka justru anak-anak. Wallahul Musta’an.

Mengalihkan wacana, Arrahmah kembali memberitakan Suriah. Suriah yang digambarkan media ini sampai hari ini tetap dilanda konflik. Saban hari militer Assad yang mereka klaim Syiah terus saja menghabisi warganya yang Sunni. Kali ini diberitakan militer Assad menyerang Rumah Sakit di Kanfrabel, kota kecil di Idlib. Judul beritanya, “Kejam, Bom Assad Hancurkan sebuah Rumah Sakit di Kafranbel, 13 Warga Sipil Tewas.”  Rumah sakit itu di bom tentara Assad yang menelan korban jiwa, 13 orang dari warga sipil. Beritanya dari mana? dilansir dari BPRS. Tidak pernah diketahui sebelumnya ada media berita dengan nama ini. Setelah ditelusuri melalui fasilitas search yang tersedia dimedia itu untuk tahu ada berapa berita yang dilansir Arrahmah dari BPRS, ternyata ini berita yang pertama. Tidak ada berita lain, selain berita ini yang dilansir dari BPRS.

Di searching di Google, baru Arrahmah yang memuat berita ini, tidak ada media nasional satupun yang memuatnya. Tapi kemungkinan tidak lama lagi, Islampos, Voa Islam dan sebangsanya, akan turut memuat juga. Keganjilan bukan hanya dari sumber beritanya yang misterius. Tapi juga dari foto yang ditampilkan. Untuk meyakinkan pembaca akan kejadian itu, Arrahmah memuat tiga foto esklusif. Yang salah satunya diberi keterangan gambar, “sarana rumah sakit di Kafranbel hancur akibat dibom Assad.” Tidak ada foto korban yang mendapat perawatan, foto jenazah bersimbah darah yang ditangisi keluarganya, bahkan foto ceceran darah di lokasi kejadian pun tidak ada.

Silahkan perhatikan tiga foto yang diklaim sebagai bagian dari RS yang hancur karena bom. Foto pertama, bangsal perawatan yang diberi keterangan dalam keadaan hancur dibom Assad. Apanya yang hancur? lihat kasurnya, lihat sepreinya, bantalnya, bahkan keranjang plastik yang masih utuh. Lihat dindingnya, jendelanya, juga lantainya yang bersih mengkilap. Bahkan dengan melihat pencahayaan dalam ruangan, kemungkinan besar, atap gedung ini pun masih utuh. Dengan gambaran korban tewas sebanyak 13 warga sipil, semestinya ledakan bom ini cukup dasyhat.

Lihat gambar kedua. Sejumlah jerigen plastik yang dalam keadaan berantakan dan berhamburan dalam ruangan, tapi tidak satupun yang memperlihatkan tanda kerusakan atau jejak terbakar karena di bom. Lihat lemari besi, yang bagian belakangnya terbuka, apa ada jejak terbakar disitu?. Apa dari yang ditampilkan gambar, ada besi yang hangus, dan sisa-sia api sebagaimana layaknya kebakaran setelah terjadi ledakan bom?. Lihat gambar ketiga, ada kepingan-kepingan pintu, kaca-kaca jendela yang pecah, tapi lihat cat dindingnya yang masih bersih, lihat ruangan ini yang bagian atasnya masih utuh. Bomnya lewat mana untuk menghancurkan pintu dan kaca-kaca yang tampak porak poranda itu, tapi tidak sedikitpun menyisakan jejak habis terbakar sama sekali?

Apa ada yang mau percaya dengan cara pemberitaan seperti ini?

Kutipan berita Arrahmah.com:

IDLIB (Arrahmah.com) – Kedzaliman Assad tidak memilih siapa korbannya. Kali ini sebuah rumah sakit di Kafranbel atau Kafr Nabl, kota kecil di Idlib menjadi sasaran bom tentara Assad, sebagaimana dilansir BPRS pada Rabu (17/12/2014).

Sumber dari Suriah melaporkan bahawa tentara rezim Assad telah mengebom sebuah rumah sakit di Kafranbel tadi malam, Selasa (16/12). Pengeboman tersebut mengakibatkan 13 korban jiwa dari warga sipil. Innalillahi wainna ilaihi raaji’uun. Semoga Muslimin terkorban syahid fii sabilillah.

- See more at: http://www.arrahmah.com/news/2014/12/17/kejam-bom-assad-hancurkan-sebuah-rumah-sakit-di-kafranbel-13-warga-sipil-tewas.html#sthash.9BPboaUV.dpuf

(Source)

Asad: Erdogan, Pembunuh Rakyat Suriah

Presiden Suriah Basyar Asad dalam kunjungannya ke sekolah anak-anak para syuhada tentara negara ini menegaskan bahwa Erdogan adalah penyebab tumpahnya darah sejak empat tahun yang lampau.  

Al-Manar melaporkan, Presiden Suriah Basyar Asad kemarin ketika bersama dengan anak-anak para syuhada tentara Suriah memandang bahwa militer Turki yang bertanggung jawab atas pertumpahan darah di negara ini. Asad dalam pertemuan itu juga menekankan bahwa pemerintah dan militer akan bergabung dengan para pemberani yang terkepung di Jisr Al-Syughur dan akan membebaskan mereka.

Basyar Asad di bagian lain dari pidatonya dengan mengisyaratkan pada peristiwa sejarah pendudukan tentara kerajaan Utsmani dan membunuh ribuan rakyat, mengatakan bahwa peristiwa itu terjadi pada tahun 1915 - 1916 yang telah menewaskan ribuan orang dan sekarang ini Erdogan sedang mengikuti dan menerapkan langkah-langkah para pendahulunya.

Perlu dicatat bahwa Presiden Turki termasuk pendukung para teroris negara dan berperan aktif dalam transitnya para teroris ke wilayah Irak dan Suriah. Begitu pula pengiriman senjata dan pelayanan medis untuk para teroris ISIL melalui wilayah Turki. Saat ini pendudukan Jisr Al-Syughur oleh para teroris dengan bantuan logistik Turki adalah salah satu tema yang dibicarakan dalam pidato kemarin Basyar Asad. Ia juga mengatakan bahwa wilayah ini akan segera dibebaskan.

Jisr Al-Syughur adalah wilayah yang didominasi oleh kaum Alawiyah di Provinsi Idlib yang dalam beberapa pekan terakhir dalam penguasaan para teroris.

Data Palsu Perang Puria Jadi Senjata Fitnah Wahabi

MASIH INGAT !!!

Terbongkarnya Fitnah Beruapa Foto-foto dan Berita Palsu Tentang Perang Suriah

 

 

Ini bisa jadi pelajaran bagi kita semua bahwa betapa liciknya WAHABI dalam menebarkan fitnah hanya untuk mengadudombah ummat islam. 

Sobat pembaca bisa melihat bagaimana kondisi timur tengah ketentraman ummat  islam hampir tak ada lagi akibat ulah kelompok-kelompok paham wahabisme, memerangi mereka yang berbeda paham, menyesatkan mereka, menghalalkan darah mereka  lalu membunuhnya atas nama islam. Ummat Islam menjadi lemah karena di obok-obok dari dari dalam yang pada akhirnya mengharuskan campur tangan barat dengan alasan perdamaian dan kemanusiaan, baratpun melakukan apa saja yang mereka inginkan terhadap ummat yang lemah, mereka juga merampas haq-haq ummat yang lemah itu. Ini semua akibat dari ulah kelakuan paham wahabisme (baca ISIS dan sejenisnya). Lalu memutar balikkan fakta menyerang kelompok lain hanya karena kedengkian dan ketakutan akan menjadi penghalang bagi perlakuan bobrok mereka .

Kalau anda marah besar setelah melihat foto-foto tragis plus berita tentang perang Suriah itu normal. Siapa yang tidak akan marah melihat saudaranya dibantai, diperkosa dan dianiaya? Kita orang-orang Indonesia yang jauh dari Suriah menjadi marah, geram dan rasanya tangan kita menjadi gatal ingin ikut angkat senjata menyerbu Suriah. Dan akhirnya banyak yang tidak sabar ada beberapa orang dengan geram dan marah “berjihad” ke Suriah. Semuanya karena dipicu setelah melihat berbagai foto pembantaian plus berita kekejaman Rezim Assad.

Foto-foto yang bertebaran di media online tampak begitu sadis dan kejam. Leher digergaji dengan gergaji mesin, wanita-wanita dibantai hingah banjir darah dan lain sebagainya. Tak heran jika ratusan ribu “Mujahidin” dari berbagai penjuru dunia “menyerbu” Suriah dan lebih 7000 “Mujahidin” telah tewas dan terus bertambah sampai hari ini. Ada Beberapa orang Indonesia ikut mati ditengah kancah perang Suriah.

Tetapi selama ini apakah anda pernah curiga dengan foto-foto dan berita sadis tersebut? Bagaimana jika anda akhirnya tahu ternyata foto-foto dan berita-berita yang anda lihat dan baca dari Media WAHABI itu terbukti palsu? Sekurang-kurangnya ada sekitar 88 foto plus berita yang terbukti palsu. Foto-foto pembantaian di Gaza, Iraq, Afghanistan, bahkan korban gempa bumi di Azerbaijan pun diklaim sebagai foto korban pembantaian Rezim Assad.

Nanti anda akan merasa heran jika sudah melihat para Tukang Fitnah ini begitu rajin mengumpulkan berbagai foto pembantaian di Gaza, Iraq, dan sebagainya kemudian membubuhinya dengan “Berita-berita” bahwa itu adalah kaum Sunni yang dibantai secara keji oleh presiden Assad. Dan bahkan oleh mereka Presiden Assad dituduh mengaku sebagai Tuhan, jelas ini fitnah yang keji.

Bagi anda yang sudah terlanjur menjadi korban fitnah, dan akhirnya menyalurkan dana untuk kepentingan propaganda mereka, segeralah sadar bahwa uang anda ternyata menjadi sia-sia belaka. Sebab ternyata perang melawan Suriah didalangi dan didanai oleh Israel, Amerika, Arab Saudi, Qatar dll, semuanya pada akhirnya adalah untuk kepentingan Israel dan Amerika. Jika berperang mendukung kaum kafir untuk membunuhi umat Islam, apakah anda yakin orang-orang Indonesia yang mati di tengah Perang Suriah itu mati Syahid? Wallohu a’lam.

Bisa download disini Semoga File masih utuh

Link download eBook Pemalsuan Data Perang Suriah ( Syria )

Mulai hari ini dan seterusnya hendaknya kita harus berhati-hati terhadap trik dan manipulasi Tukang Fitnah dan Adu Domba. Jika akhirnya adu domba dan fitnah itu berakibat terjadinya bughot (pemberontakan) yang akhirnya saling bunuh, apalagi saling membunuh itu terjadi di antara sesama muslim tempatnya adalah di neraka. Ingatlah, tentara Suriah itu adalah kaum muslim dari Sunni ataupun Syi’ah. Begitu pula dengan rakyat Suriah90% adalah kaum Muslimin. Dan bughot itu dilarang oleh ajaran Islam.

Berhentilah dari aksi mengadu-domba manusia sehingga terjadi saling bunuh dengan tersebarnya berita (baca: Fitnah) yang kita buat. Takutlah pada api neraka untuk orang yang gemar membuat fitnah dan mengadu domba:

“Rasulullah s.a.w. bersabda: “Tidak dapat masuk surga seorang yang gemar mengadu domba.” (Muttafaq ‘alaih)

Allah Ta’ala berfirman: “Jangan pula engkau mematuhi orang yang suka mencela, berjalan membuat adu domba.” (al-Qalam: 11)

Bagi yang ingin mendownload Kumpulan Pemalsuan Data / Foto Perang Suriah silahkan klik link di bawah ini:

Ebook format CHM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/gc923e8bn149shp/Pemalsuan%20data%20konflik%20syria.chm

Ebook format PDF: https://www.dropbox.com/s/57leve7b1vxa8xw/Pemalsuan%20data%20konflik%20syria2.pdf

Ebook format docx: https://www.dropbox.com/s/kvi1alos6vzfhqi/Pemalsuan%20data%20konflik%20syria.docx

Ebook format CHM: http://www.mediafire.com/download/hr6d5w4x24w2tox/Pemalsuan_data_konflik_syria.chm

 

(Source)

Amerika Kirim Ratusan Tentaranya Latih Pemberontak Suriah

Foto: Reuters

Ratusan tentara Amerika Serikat tiba di Turki untuk melatih dan mempersenjatai para pemberontak Suriah yang bertempur melawan rezim Bashar al-Assad. washington mengaku program ini juga dipersiapkan untuk melawan ISIS. Amerika berdalih, program ini sesuai kesepakatan dengan Turki untuk menghentikan konflik tidak berujung di Suriah.

Diberitakan harian Turki Hurriyet, Sabtu 2 Mei 2015, sebanyak 123 tentara AS terlibat dalam pelatihan ini. Jumlah yang sama juga datang dari tentara Turki untuk melatih para pemberontak Suriah terpilih.

Sebanyak 83 tentara AS akan ditempatkan di Pangkalan Udara Incirlik, sisanya ke pangkalan Hirfanli. Para pejuang Suriah yang akan dilatih di Hirfanli akan dikirim ke provinsi Hatay, di mana mereka akan diajari penggunaan senjata, termasuk senjata anti-tank, senapan infanteri dan senapan mesin.

Program ini sebenarnya telah disepakati Turki dan AS sejak Februari lalu, namun tertunda karena perdebatan soal kelompok perlawanan mana yang layak menerima pelatihan. Pasalnya, banyak faksi pejuang di Suriah, mulai dari yang moderat dan radikal. Kelompok moderat dipilih dalam hal ini.
Sebelumnya negosiasi kerja sama ini telah berlangsung selama berbulan-bulan. Pemerintah Ankara enggan terlibat penuh dalam misi AS memberantas ISIS kecuali Washington mengadopsi “strategi terintegrasi” untuk menghentikan konflik di Suriah, termasuk penggulingan Presiden Assad dari kepemimpinannya.

Amerika Serikat dalam berbagai kesempatan juga mengatakan bahwa salah satu cara mengakhiri konflik di Suriah adalah dengan lengsernya Assad. Konflik di Suriah diperparah dengan kehadiran ISIS yang menguasai beberapa wilayah di negara itu.

Konflik yang berlangsung sejak 2011 lalu itu diduga telah menewaskan lebih dari 200 ribu orang.
Selain kerja sama pelatihan pejuang Suriah, AS dan Turki menyepakati soal izin penggunaan pangkalan udara Incirlik untuk penerbangan pesawat penyerang nirawak, drone, milik Pentagon.
Lokasi Incirlik yang strategis, yaitu terletak sekitar 400 kilometer dari Raqqa, Suriah, dinilai tempat yang tepat untuk menerbangkan drone.(Source)

SEKALI LAGI KEBOHONGAN ARRAHMAH.COM

Faiz Shakir dalam sebuah acara talkshow yang digelar Center for American Progress di Amerika. Jubir Hizbollah?

Saya tidak pernah mendapatkan media massa seperti arrahman.com dalam hal "membohongi publik". Kebohongan seakan telah menjadi kebiasaan sehari-hari media ini hingga hampir tidak ditemukan sedikitpun kebenaran dalam berita-beritanya.

Kali ini saya akan megomentari berita yang dilaporkan arrahmah.com tgl 22 Agustus berjudul "Video jubir "Hizbullah" Syiah ancam akan serang Makkah dan Madinah". Berita ini adalah tentang seorang bernama Faiz Syakir yang oleh arrahman.com dinisbatkan sebagai "juru bicara" Hizbollah.

Sebelumnya saya belum mengetahui siapa Faiz Syakir, namun dari penampilannya dalam berita tersebut di atas saya mencurigai ada ketidak beresan. Faiz Syakir mengenakan jas dan dasi, sementara setahu saya tidak ada seorang pengurus Hizbollah pun yang pernah mengenakan jas dan dasi (setidaknya di depan publik). Mungkin ada anggota Hizbollah yang menjadi politisi atau pejabat pemerintah Lebanon yang mengenakan jas dan dasi, tapi tetap saja mereka bukan pengurus organisasi.

Karena penasaran saya, apalagi dengan isi beritanya yang "provokatif", saya pun melakukan searching di "google". Hasil pertama yang saya dapatkan adalah berita di media online Huffington Post berjudul "Nancy Pelosi Membayar Faiz Shakir Sebagai Direktur Media" yang dipostingkan tgl 5 Agustus 2012.

Berita di Huffington Post tersebut, sebagaimana disebutkan juga oleh wikipedia, menyebutkan bahwa Faiz Shakir adalah aktifis di lembaga kajian bernama "Center for American Progress (CAP)". Ia adalah pemimpin redaksi blog milik lembaga tersebut yang bernama "Think Progress". Sebagaimana diketahui CAP adalah lembaga kajian yang sangat pro-Israel alias neo-konservatif. Orang-orang neo konservatif-lah yang berada di belakang kebijakan "teror" George W. Bush yang sangat agresif menghancurkan negara-negara Islam demi keamanan Israel. Nancy Pelosi sendiri juga dikenal sebagai salah seorang politisi Amerika yang sangat pro-Israel.

Adalah sangat tidak masuk akal seorang pejabat publik Amerika mengangkat seorang pejabat Hizbollah, yang oleh Amerika telah ditetapkan sebagai oragnisasi teroris, sebagai penasihat dan pembantunya. Sampai di sini terbukti bahwa arrahman.com telah melakukan kebohongan publik dan patut untuk mendapatkan sanksi sosial kalau bukan sanksi pidana.

Namun tentu saja arrahmah.com akan tetap berkelit jika dipaparkan fakta-fakta itu.

"Lho itu khan justru membuktikan bahwa Hizbollah adalah antek Amerika?" Demikian kira-kira yang akan mereka katakan ketika kepada mereka dipaparkan fakta-fakta tersebut di atas. Inilah kebiasaan para pembohong di manapun berada. Bukannya membuktikan tuduhan bohongnya, mereka justru menutupinya dengan kebohongan lain yang lebih besar.

Bagi para awak arrahman.com saya memahami sikap mereka seperti itu karena mereka memang hidup dari itu. Mereka mendapatkan gaji dari kelompok kepentingan politik tertentu yang membayar mereka untuk berbohong. Yang saya sayangkan adalah publik yang menjadi korban kebohongan. Mereka yang kerap kali berteriak-teriak "jihad ... jihad... Allahu Akbar!", kemudian pergi ke Syria untuk membunuhi orang-orang Islam (mayoritas rakyat Syria yang menjadi korban pembunuhan perang adalah orang Islam) di sana dan memperkosa para muslimahnya (mengikutu fatwa ulama wahabi), dan kemudian bermimpi masuk surga. Karena propaganda-propagandi anti-Shiah dan anti-Iran seperti itulah  terjadi perpecahan di antara umat Islam yang justru memberi keuntungan bagi para zionis.

Berikut adalah berita yang di arrahmah.com tersebut di atas:



Video jubir "Hizbullah" Syiah ancam akan serang Makkah dan Madinah
Fadly Kamis, 15 Syawwal 1434 H / 22 Agustus 2013 13:15

(Arrahmah.com) - Faiz Syakir, salah seorang juru bicara Hizbullah (Libanon), berbicara secara langsung dalam sebuah acara tv di OTV. “Hizbullah tidak akan dapat dimusnahkan. Hizbullah pasukan terkuat di kalangan negara-negara Arab. Lebih kuat daripada seluruh peradaban di dunia dari segi ekonomi, kekuatan militer dan sosial,” ujar Syakir, dan kemudian rekamannya juga beredar di youtube.

Pernyataan Syakir ini sehubungan dengan adanya ancaman Bandar bin Sultan—putera mahkota Raja Qatar yang akan menyerang Basyar al-Assad. “Apa lagi yang kalian pikirkan? Kami tidak takut pada ancaman itu? Bahkan kami tidak takut pada Saudi, sekalipun dengan seluruh kekuatannya, dari raja hingga rakyat mereka yang terakhir. Mereka pikir, mereka siapa?”

“Jika mereka membom Gunung Qasiun di Damaskus, pusat kekuatan militer Basyar, maka kami akan menyerang Mekah di depan kepala mereka sendiri!”

Wartawan yang hadir di situ sontak melontarkan pertanyaan, “Mekkah? Bukankah itu tempat suci bagi mereka?”

“Biarkan saya berbicara. Saya tidak peduli lagi semuanya. Ini fakta. Kami akan memusnahkan Mekkah dan Madinah, juga Jeddah dan Riyadh, dengan semua yang ada di dalamnya, yang tinggal dalam kota-kota ini. Ini fakta dan strategi kami. Keberadaan kami lebih penting dari ‘batu-batu’ dan ‘bukit-bukit’ mereka.”

Wartawan yang masih dalam keadaan terkejut, kembali bertanya, “Siapa yang akan memusnahkan Mekkah? Iran? Suriah? Hizbullah? Tempat itu adalah tempat suci bagi mereka…”

“Saya tidak akan mengatakannya. Tapi jika mereka mengancam kami, kami tahu bagaimana membalas ancaman itu,” demikian Syakir.

REF:
"Nancy Pelosi Hires Think Progress' Faiz Shakir As Director Of New Media"; huffington post; 5 Agustus 2012

Sumber Fitnah: http://www.arrahmah.com/news/2013/08/22/video-jubir-hizbullah-syiah-ancam-serang-makkah-madinah.html#sthash.YkJ0enFN.dpuf

HASIL BUKTI SUNNI DAN SYIAH DI ADU SALAFI WAHABI DAN ZIONIS ISRAEL, PENTINGNYA DETEKSI DINI ANCAMAN BRUTALITAS DARI WAHABI EKSTRIM

APAKAH INDONESIA MAU MENGALAMI NASIB SEPERTI DI LIBYA DAN SURIAH ?

BELAJAR DARI REALITAS YANG DAPAT DIKETAHUI DARI KEHANCURAN BERBAGAI PENINGGALAN SEJARAH SITUS-SITUS ISLAM DAN BUDAYA NASIONAL DI BEBERAPA NEGARA ISLAM DI IRAK, LIBYA, MESIR, SURIA DLL.

DAPAT DIKETAHUI BAHWA UMUMNYA PELAKU PENGHANCURAN DILAKUKAN OLEH KELOMPOK EKSTRIM YANG BERPAHAM SALAFI ALA WAHABI. KELOMPOK INI IDENTIK DENGAN MUDAHNYA MENGANGGAP MUSLIM LAINNYA SEBAGAI PELAKU BID'AH/SYIRIK/ DAN MUDAH MENGKAFIRKAN MUSLIM DILUAR ALIRANNYA.

KEJADIAN DI IRAK,...BAHKAN ENTAH ADA KONSPIRASI DENGAN GERAKAN WAHABI ISIS...DIMANA DENGAN MUDAHNYA KOTA-KOTA DI UTARA IRAK BISA DIREBUT OLEH ISIS BESERTA PROPERTI YANG ADA...BELAKANGAN MILITER MULAI BERUPAYA MEREBUT KEMBALI.

PERISTIWA DI IRAK TADI MENUNJUKKAN KELEMAHAN ANTISIPASI PEMERINTAH DAN KETIDAKMAMPUAN SISTEM PERTAHANAN DINI DARI ANCAMAN TERORIS YANG TERSISTEMATIS.

APAKAH INDONESIA MAU MENGALAMI NASIB SEPERTI DI IRAK, LIBYA DAN IRAQ ?

KASUS LIBYA
Ditumbangkannya Pemimpin Libya 
oleh Konspirasi Global

Muammar Qadafi menjalin Hubungan dengan 
Negara dan Tokoh Anti Kolonialisme

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Muammar Qadafi adalah seorang Muslim

 

 

 

 

 

 (Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi reads during a mass prayer during a celebration to mark the birthday of Prophet Mohammed in Agadez March 30, 2007. REUTERS/Samuel De Jaegere)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Surat kabar Libya Akhbar Libiya (26/2/2010) melansir, beberapa raja-raja dan pemimpin Afrika dari negara Nigeria, Madagaskar, dan Ghana mengucapkan syahadat di hadapan Qadzafi saat dilangsungkannya.

 

Demonstrasi Keislaman ke-V yang rutin digelar tahunan di kota Benghazi, Libya, pada Kamis (25/2) malam.
Sebelum para raja dan pemimpin suku itu mengucapkan dua kalimat syahadat, Qadzafi terlebih dahulu memberikan ceramah dan wejangan keislaman, semisal rukun Iman, Islam, dan ajaran-ajaran Islam mulia lainnya.

Qadzafi juga menyerukan, agar senantiasa menjalankan apa yang telah dititahkan Allah dan menjauhi segala laranganNya, menjalankan ibadah dan amal-amalan shaleh.

Setelah memberikan ceramah dan wejangan, Qadzafi pun menuntun mereka mengucapkan dua kalimat syahadat, dengan bahasa Arab dan Prancis, serta menuntun mereka membaca surat Alfatihah. (ags/al)
http://mhfathurrahim.wordpress.com/2010/02/

 

Libya’s Gaddafi upsets Italy with bid to convert women to Islam

By James MackenzieAugust 30, 2010

http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/08/30/libyas-gaddafi-upsets-italy-with-bid-to-convert-women-to-islam/

 

(Photo: Italian woman with Koran at Gaddafi meeting, 30 August 2010/Max Rossi)

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi’s attempt to convert dozens of young women to Islam during a visit to Italy led to an angry reaction from Italian media on Monday. The mercurial Gaddafi invited a large group of young women hired by a hostessing agency to an event at a Libyan cultural centre in Rome on Sunday and tried to convert them to Islam.

“What would happen if a European head of state went to Libya or another Islamic country and invited everyone to convert to Christianity?”asked the daily Il Messagero. “We believe it would provoke very strong reactions across the Islamic world.”

Press reports said three women had converted, but there was no way to verify if that was true. The event, due to be repeated on Monday, followed a similar reception involving some 200 women on a previous visit by Gaddafi to Rome last year.

Italy is now Libya’s biggest trading partner and buys much of its oil and gas from the energy-rich North African state. Libya is also a big investor in the Italian economy. But many commentators were not happy. “The national interest does not justify and certainly does not require anyone to agree to playing host to grotesque acts of clowning,”wrote La Stampa in an editorial.

======================================

 

 

A group of about 200 young women arrives for a meeting with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi at a Libyan cultural centre in Rome August 30, 2010.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/30/us-italy-libya-idUSTRE67T3G920100830
================================

 

Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi gave a lesson on Islam and copies of the Quran to a few hundred young Italian women Sunday as he arrived in Rome
http://noahdavidsimon.blogspot.com/2010_08_01_archive.html
==============================

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://covenantartists.blogspot.com/2009/11/lbn-investigates-revenues-generated.html
===========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A woman speaks with the media as she arrives with about 200 other young women for a meeting with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi at a Libyan cultural centre in Rome
===============================================

Gadhafi Upsets Some Italians by Urging Conversion to Islam

By

Stacy Meichtry

Updated Aug. 30, 2010 12:01 a.m. ET

ROME—Libyan leader Col. Moammar Gadhafi, who holds increasing sway in the Italian economy, upset some Italians by urging conversion to Islam during a three-day visit to the predominantly Roman Catholic country.

Col. Gadhafi held a series of private meetings on Sunday and Monday with some 800 Italian women and a small group of young men organized by a hostess agency and paid for by the Libyan government.

 

 

A woman wearing a headscarf leaves a meeting with Libyan leader Col. Moammar Gadhafi in Rome on Monday. Reuters

Some women who took part in a meeting Sunday told reporters the Libyan leader lectured them on Islam, and then presided over a ceremony in which, they said, a handful of women converted to Islam. The attendees, who were paid to attend the meeting, left carrying bound copies of the Quran that they said were gifts from Col. Gadhafi.

The meetings have become a ritual accompanying Col. Gadhafi's frequent visits to Rome since the signing of a "friendship" accord in 2008. Rome then pledged €5 billion ($6.37 billion) to Tripoli as reparations for Italy's decadeslong occupation of Libya that ended in the 1930s.

Under the treaty, Col. Gadhafi agreed to crack down on undocumented immigrants using Libya as a gateway to Italy and the rest of Europe. Since then, oil-rich Libya has become one of Italy's biggest investors, snapping up stakes in Italian companies such as oil giant Eni E +1.10% SpA. Libya is now the single largest shareholder in Italy's biggest bank, UniCredit SpA, after backing a capital increase that helped to shore up the bank's finances.

It is unclear exactly what purpose the meetings with young women serve. The women are recruited by Rome-based casting agency Hostessweb, and are paid for by the Libyan government, said Alessandro Londero, the agency's president. Mr. Londero, who also attended the lectures, said the Libyan leader addressed the women "a bit like a prophet," urging them to convert to Islam.

The Italian public doesn't like the displays. "Gadhafi needs to show respect. Don't come to Italy and tell Italians and Europeans to convert to Islam," Rocco Buttilgione, president of the pro-Vatican party Union of Christian Democrats, said in an interview with leftist daily La Repubblica.

"Every time Ghadafi returns to Rome it's worse than the last time," said Emma Bonino, a senator from a left-wing opposition party.

Several newspapers, including Italy's largest daily, Corriere della Sera, quoted Col. Gadhafi as telling the women "Islam should become the religion of Europe." La Repubblica headlined a front-page editorial Monday, "A Humiliating Circus."

A spokesman for the Libyan Embassy in Rome declined to comment on whether any conversions took place during the meetings. He also declined to provide a copy of Col. Gadhafi's address to the women, saying that the leader's "speech on Islam was very clear and requires no explanation."

Col. Gadhafi arrived in Rome on Sunday with an entourage aboard a flotilla of four jets that carried hundreds of guests and dozens of purebred Berber horses that paraded during an equestrian exercise Monday. Col. Gadhafi disembarked clad in traditional Bedouin robes and flanked by two of his "Amazon women," personal bodyguards clad in military fatigues and berets.

He took an impromptu stroll through the city's piazzas Sunday evening, snapped by paparazzi as he stopped for gelato and cappuccino. On Monday, he toured a photo exhibit with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, the billionaire media magnate. They were scheduled to dine later with 800 guests.

The Italian women who came to the meetings were recruited over Hostessweb's Internet site and paid between €80 and €150, depending on their proximity to Rome, according to Mr. Londero. Hostessweb then bused the recruits to the Libyan Academy adjacent to the Libyan Embassy. Mr. Londero organized a similar meeting during Col. Gadhafi's last visit, in June 2009, that produced a smaller turnout.

So far, Mr. Berlusconi hasn't made any statements on the meetings. Carlo Giovanardi, an Italian government undersecretary, called Col. Gadhafi's lecture "remarks made during a private meeting."

Col. Gadhafi's financial largesse makes him tough for Mr. Berlusconi's government to criticize, wrote Carmelo Palma, in an editorial published by Fare Futuro, an influential right-wing think tank. "Italy has become Gadhafi's Disneyland," he added.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704323704575461854257553796

======================================

Was Moammar Gadhafi Killed Because His Plans To Introduce A Gold Dinar Currency Threatened The U.S. Dollar?

http://www.thisis50.com/profiles/blogs/was-muammar-gaddafi-killed-because-his-plans-to-introduce-a-gold?xg_source=activity 

• Posted by ChasinDatPaper on October 22, 2011 at 11:30am

 

Video After The Jump


There's growing speculation that Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi was targeted by NATO because of his plans to introduce a gold dinar – "a single African currency made from gold, a true sharing of the wealth."


Gaddafi had called on African and Muslim nations to join together to create this new currency that would rival the U.S. dollar and euro. The plan was to sell oil and other resources around the world only for gold dinars. A country's wealth would depend on how much gold they have and not how many dollars they trade.


Libya has 144 tons of gold. By comparison the United Kingdom has double that amount but 10 times the population.


Had the plan succeeded it would have shifted the economic balance of the world.


"If Gaddafi had an intent to try to re-price his oil or whatever else the country was selling on the global market and accept something else as a currency or maybe launch a gold dinar currency, any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world's central banks," Anthony Wile, founder and Chief Editor of the Daily Bell told Russia Today in an interview back in May 2011. "So yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and the need for other reasons to be brought forward from moving him from power."


Do you believe Gaddafi was targeted because of his plans to introduce this new currency?
===============

Saving the world economy from Gaddafi

Published time: May 05, 2011 02:29
Edited time: May 05, 2011 08:42 

http://rt.com/news/economy-oil-gold-libya/

Some believe it is about protecting civilians, others say it is about oil, but some are convinced intervention in Libya is all about Gaddafi’s plan to introduce the gold dinar, a single African currency made from gold, a true sharing of the wealth.
­“It’s one of these things that you have to plan almost in secret, because as soon as you say you’re going to change over from the dollar to something else, you’re going to be targeted,” says Ministry of Peace founder Dr James Thring. “There were two conferences on this, in 1986 and 2000, organized by Gaddafi. Everybody was interested, most countries in Africa were keen.”
Gaddafi did not give up. In the months leading up to the military intervention, he called on African and Muslim nations to join together to create this new currency that would rival the dollar and euro. They would sell oil and other resources around the world only for gold dinars.
It is an idea that would shift the economic balance of the world.
A country’s wealth would depend on how much gold it had and not how many dollars it traded. And Libya has 144 tons of gold. The UK, for example, has twice as much, but ten times the population.
“If Gaddafi had an intent to try to re-price his oil or whatever else the country was selling on the global market and accept something else as a currency or maybe launch a gold dinar currency, any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world’s central banks,” says Anthony Wile, founder and chief editor of the Daily Bell.

“So yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and the need for other reasons to be brought forward from moving him from power.”
And it has happened before.
In 2000, Saddam Hussein announced Iraqi oil would be traded in euros, not dollars. Some say sanctions and an invasion followed because the Americans were desperate to prevent OPEC from transferring oil trading in all its member countries to the euro.
A gold dinar would have had serious consequences for the world financial system, but may also have empowered the people of Africa, something black activists say the US wants to avoid at all costs.
“The US have denied self-determination to Africans inside the US, so we are not surprised by anything the US would do to hinder the self-determination of Africans on the continent,” says Cynthia Ann McKinney, a former US Congresswoman.
The UK’s gold is kept in a secure vault somewhere in the depths of the Bank of England. As in most developed countries, there is not enough to go around.
But that is not the case in countries like Libya and many of the Gulf States.
A gold dinar would have given oil-rich African and Middle Eastern countries the power to turn around to their energy-hungry customers and say:  “Sorry, the price has gone up, and we want gold.”
Some say the US and its NATO allies literally could not afford to let that happen.
===============================

QADDAFI DALAM PIDATO RESMI PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA MEMBONGKAR KEPALSUAN DAN KONSPIRASI 
PERSERIKATAN BANGSA-BANGSA (PBB)

Muammar Gaddafi
Hero of the Islamic World who ripped up the UN Charter 
at the UN platform - 2009

INILAH SALINAN PIDATO YANG MENGGEMPARKAN PBB DAN DUNIA

Complete Transcript
[Historic Speech of Gaddafi to UN General Assembly, 2009]

 Note: United Nations removed the English transcript of his speech from its website and western media removed the transcript from all types of media resources. MetaExistence Organization made an effort to restore the original transcript from his video speech. Gaddafi showed a actual evil face of UN and security council to the world.
Truth always be truth . . . . You never hide it

 Here is complete transcript of what he said:

Distinguished members of the General Assembly of the United Nations, in the name of the African Union, I would like to welcome you. This gathering will be an historic one in the world and the history of the world.

And in the name of the General Assembly that is presided by Libya now, in the name of the African Union, and in the name of 1,000 traditional African kingdoms in your own name, I would like to seize this opportunity to present congratulations to our son, Obama, because this is the first time that he is attending the General Assembly in this capacity as the president of the United States, and we greet him because it is the hosting country of this gathering.

This meeting comes at the corner at the (inaudible) of so many challenges that face us, and that the whole world should come together and unite and should put all efforts together. Serious efforts should be put together by the world so that the world will defeat these challenges which constitute the main common enemy to all of us  challenges of climate, challenges of international crises, or the economic capitalist deterioration, and the food crisis (inaudible).

Perhaps this swine virus may be one of those viruses that was created in the laboratory and it got out of control because it was meant in the beginning to be used as a military weapon, as well as the military, the nuclear proliferations, as well as the hypocrisy, the deteriorations, and the control of (inaudible).

Dear brothers, as you know, the United Nations was established and founded by countries where against the Germans at the time. The United Nations that we have today is different today. But the United Nations it is the countries or the nations that would come together against Germany during the Second World War.

These countries constituted (inaudible) and give members seats its own members. And granted we were not present at the time. And the United Nations was tailored according to these countries and wanted from us to wear the clothes or the suit that was tailored against Germany. That is the real substance and context of the United Nations as it was founded 40 years  or 60 years ago.

This happened during the absence of over 165 countries where the ratio was one of eight. And one was present and eight were absent.

Those  they created or they made the charter, and you know  I have the charter, a copy of it. And one should read the charter of the United Nations. The preamble of the United Nations is different from the provisions and the articles. How this came to existence, those who attended in San Francisco in 1945, they all participated in the preamble, but they left articles and the provisions and the procedures the (inaudible). They left it to the job of the experts and the countries who are interested, which are the countries who created the Security Council, which countries came together united against Germany.

The preamble is very tempting, and no one is objecting to the preamble, but everything that came after that is completely in contradiction with the preamble. This is what we have now this is what we are injecting, and we should never continue.

This came to an end during the Second World War. The preamble says that the nations are equal whether they are small or big.

Are we equal in the permanent seats. No. We are not equals.

And the preamble says that all nations are equal whether they are small nations or whether they are big nations as far as rights.

Do we have rights of a veto. Are we equals. The preamble says that we are equals in our rights whether we are big or small. This is what is stated, and this is what we have agreed in the preamble.

So, the veto is against the charter. The permanent seats are against the charter. We do not accept it and we do not acknowledge it, neither do we recognize it.
(Gaddafi ripped up a UN charter at this point)

The charter states that we in the preamble, I mean that we should not resort to military force unless it is a common interest.

This is the preamble which we were happy and we signed, and we joined the United Nations because we wanted the charter to be like that.

It says that the armed forces only use it when it is a common interest to all nations. But after that, what happened? Sixty five wars broke out after the establishment of the United Nations and after the establishment of the Security Council, and after this establishment. Sixty five, and the victims are millions more than victims of the Second World War.

Are these wars and the aggressions and the force that was used, and the power (ph) in the 65 wars, in the common interest of all of us? No. It was the interest of one country or three countries or four countries or one country. But it was not in the interest of all the nations.

And we shall come and discuss about the wars, whether these wars broke out was in the interest of one country or were in the whole nations. This is in full contradictions and full intervention of the United Nation charters, and we signed that. And unless we do things in the charter of the United Nations, according to which we agreed, otherwise we don't speak diplomatically, we are not afraid. We don't (inaudible), and we were not being nice to anybody.

Now we are talking about the future of (inaudible). There is no hypocrisy, no diplomacy, because it is a decisive and important matter. (inaudible) of understanding and hypocrisy created to 65 wars after the establishment of the United Nations.

The preamble states also that if there is a use of force, then there must be  then it must be the United Nations force, or the United Nations military interventions, according to the joint ventures of the United Nations, not country, or one, two country, or three country, using the force or the military power. The United Nations, all of it, will decide to go to war to maintain peace and world security.

And if there's any aggression by one country against another after the 45 after the establishment of this United Nations, if there is any aggression against any country, the United Nations, all together, should deter and stop this aggression, and should check this aggression. I mean, if a country, any country, Libya, for instance, makes an attack or an aggression against France, then the whole United Nations should check the Libyan aggression against France, because France is a member state, an independent state in the United General Assembly, that is a sovereign country, a member state of the United Nations. And all of us, we have to protect the sovereignty of all nations collectively.

But 65 wars, aggressive wars, took place without any actions from the United Nations to stop and check these wars. And eight fierce, big wars and victims of these wars among 2 (ph) million  made or initiated by the countries who have member states and veto. Those countries who are believed that they would maintain the sovereignty and independence of the people, these countries actually use aggressive force against people.

We wanted to believe that these countries will make peace and security in the world and protect the people. These countries actually resorted to aggressive wars and (inaudible) wars. And as a matter of fact, they enjoyed the veto that was given to them by themselves and enjoyed the member states of the Security Council. But in the meantime, they actually initiated the war which amounted to millions of victims.

So, in this charter, there is nothing that the United Nations will interfere which will be the pure business of the internal affairs I mean, the government. It is the internal affairs of a certain government.

No country has the right to interfere in this affair, the sort of government whether it is a socialist, capitalist system, or whether it is a reactionary progressive. This is the responsibility of the society. It is an internal matter of the people concerned of a certain country.

Rome  one day the senators of Rome they gave him (ph) the amendment (ph) to be a dictator, because at the time it was good for Rome. No one can say to Rome at the time that you give Caesar this veto. The veto is not mentioned in the charter.

(inaudible) we joined the United Nations because we thought we are equals. And then there is one country that can object to all of the decisions that we make, and it has a member seat. And who has given this country this member seat?

These four countries, they have given themselves member states. The only country that we have voted in this General Assembly is China. China, we have voted to give China a member state in the Security Council.

This was done democratically, but the other member seats was not Democratic, was imposed upon us. This should not be accepted by us, and it was a dictatorial procedure that was done against our will.

United (ph) reform is not increasing of the member states. It is just making things worse. I don't know how this will be translated, but if we add more water, it will be more muddy.

This is a typical expression (ph) to add insult to injury. I mean, to make things worse, and to make things even worse by how? Because many big countries will be added further to the former big countries that we already have, and like this it will be (inaudible). So we'll have more superpowers.

Then from here we reject having any more seats done in this way. The solution is not in having more seats. And the most dangerous one, if we have more superpowers already, the superpowers that we already have this will crash down the peoples of all small peoples of third-world countries which now are coming together in what may be called the G100.

There are 100 small countries coming together in a forum that is called a forum of small states. These countries will be crushed by superpowers, because further superpowers, further big countries will be added to already (inaudible). This door should be closed, and we reject that strongly and categorically.

Then you open the door to have more seats in the Security Council. This will add more poverty, more injustice, more tension at the world level, and more competition and the level of the Security Council. And then we shall have there will be high competition between certain countries  between Italy, Germany, Indonesia, India, Pakistan, the Philippines, Japan, Brazil, Nigeria, Argentina, Brazil, Nigeria, Libya, Egypt, Congo, South Africa, Tanzania, Turkey, Iran, Greece, Ukraine (ph).

All of these countries will ask to have a seat at the Security Council. And like this, we shall have a raise (ph) of competitions, then it will be impractical.

So, what is the solution? The solution is that for the solution presided for the General Assembly by (inaudible), which will be a binding resolution taken by the General Assembly, which will not (inaudible) any other quarter.

The solution is that we shall close the admission of the member states and we don't have anymore member states. This is an item that is provided for the General Assembly, presided by Dr. Thratcher (ph) right now.

And in place of that will be the achievement of the democracy based on equality between member states. There should be equality between member states and instrumentation of the powers and demanded of the Security Council, the General Assembly. And the membership will be for the associations, not for countries, because if we open the door for more members and more memberships for the countries because this will give the right to any country to have a member seat in the country. And the preamble allowed that.

No country can say, for instance, you don't have a seat in the Security Council if a seat is given to Germany. Italy will  Germany, maybe for the argument of Italy, will say it was not Germany was an aggressive country, was (inaudible), and was defeated in the Second World War. And if we give India a seat, then Pakistan will say we are a nuclear country and we are at war, and then Pakistan  that would be a danger thing.

If we give it to Japan, then we should give Indonesia, being the biggest Muslim country in the world. And then Turkey or Kenya will have the same rights. What can we say to them? Argentina, Brazil, Libya. Libya, that has discarded the WMD program, because it will deserve a member state because then it then has done service to security by discarded this program. And South Africa will do the same and Tanzania will do the same.

All these countries are important, and (inaudible).

This door should be this is falsehood, and this is a trick, and if we went to reform the United Nations, and then we bring more superpowers, more countries, and then we add more to the already big superpowers which did quite a lot of suffering to us. And then the solution is to achieve democracy at the level of the general congress of the world, which is the General Assembly, which is transformation of the Security Council power to the General Assembly.

And the Security Council will be just an instrument to implement the decisions taken by the General Assembly. It will be the parliament of the world and the legislative assembly of the world, and this is democracy, and the Security Council should be responsible before the General Assembly, and we should not accept it.

These are the legislators which are the members of the General Assembly and the resolution should be binding. It is said that the General Assembly should do this and this at the recommendation of the Security Council. The Security Council should do this and that according to the rules and the orders of the United Nations.

These are the United Nations, are including all the members of the world, not the Security Council, which include only 10 member states. How can we be happy about the world peace and security if the four countries or 10 countries  controlled the whole world?

We are 190 nations and countries, and we are like the (inaudible). I mean, we just speak and nobody is implementing our decisions. We are just like decor.

You are made like decor. You are like a Hyde Park. You were I mean, without any real substance. It's just according to speaker like the speakers of the Hyde Park corner. No more, no less. You just make a speech and then disappear. This is who you are right now.

The Security Council is an executive body for the resolution taken by the General Assembly only. And in this case, there will be no competition for the Security Council member states, because once the Security Council becomes a tool to implement the resolution taken by the General Assembly, there will be no need for any competition.

The Security Council should just be a representative for all nations, but not by a state this is what is submitted now to the General Assembly but a permanent seat for all space, for all union, I mean. Twenty-seven countries for European Union. They should have a permanent seat at the Security Council.

The African Union should have a member seat in the Security Council, 53 countries. And Latin Americans should have a permanent seat and the (inaudible) should have a permanent seat. And the (inaudible), plus two or countries, should have a permanent seat. The Russian federation should have a permanent seat.

The United States of America, which is 50 states, it has already a permanent member seat at the Security Council. (inaudible), once it is established or is about to be established should have a member state. (inaudible) should have a member seat, 22 countries.

The Islamic Conference, 45 countries, should have also a member seat. Then (inaudible) should have a permanent member seat in the Security Council.

Then we have the G 100. Then we think about that perhaps all small countries, the forum (ph) of small countries, perhaps they would have a permanent member seat also. If there are countries outside of the (inaudible) that I mentioned, maybe we can assign a permanent seat will be given to them by rotation every six months. Japan, Australia, may be outside any union, or Australia, or in other countries.

Perhaps they would not join the (inaudible) or the Russian Federation, or not a member in the European Union or the Latin American Union, or in the African Union. Perhaps any country will be given this is the solution, that now this is meant for a vote for the Security Council for the General Assembly to take a vote.

This is a vital, important issue. And I mentioned, the General Assembly is the congress of the world, the parliament of the world, the master of the world, and no one should object. No one should we are the nations. Anyone outside this General Assembly we do not recognize.

(inaudible) and Ban Ki moon, his Excellency, the secretary general of the United Nations, will make the draft, the legal draft, and set up the necessary committees to submit this for voting. The Security Council from now will be made of unions.

This is justice. This is democracy. And then we put an end to the Security Council will be occupied by the countries which one has nuclear weapons, which one has technology.

This is terrorism. We cannot have the Security Council and the countries which have the superpowers. This is terrorism in itself.

If you went a world that lives in peace, united, we should do that. If we want a world, then it's up to you. Then we have conflict, and then we should continue fighting each other, or conflict until doomsday or until the end of the world.

These members which have a veto or they don't have a veto. All the Security Council, they should have the right of the veto. All of these unions belonging to the seats. Or we should cancel the whole veto with the new formation.

This is the real Security Council. And anyhow, the new Security Council that is submitted to the new proposals, submitted to the General Assembly for voting, will be an executive council which will be under the control of the General Assembly. The General Assembly, which will have the real power and the real (inaudible), like all countries will be equal in the Security Council in the same way they are equal in the General Assembly.

We are in the General Assembly. We have equal votes. We should also be equals next door, which is the Security Council.

A country has a veto, a country doesn't have a veto, a country has a member seat, and then a country should not have a member seat, we should not accept it and it should be a mandate (ph) from now. And we should not be subjected to it, and we should not accept any resolution taken by the Security Council according to the composition right now.

We were (inaudible). We are independent. And now we are here to decide the future of the world in a democratic way that will maintain world and peace security. All people, small and big, are equals.

This is terrorism, like the terrorism of the Al Qaida. This is terrorism. Terrorism is not just Al Qaida, but it can be also in other forms.

We should resort to the maturity of the votes of the General Assembly alone, and we should not vote (ph). If the General Assembly takes a vote, then it should be implemented and should be taken, and taken into decision. And it should be enforced.

And no one should say I am above and higher than the General Assembly. Anyone who says that I'm higher than or above the General Assembly should leave the United Nations and be alone.

Democracy is not for the rich or for the for the rich or for the one who terrorizes. So, for the one who is more powerful than us, (inaudible) democracy? No.

The higher (inaudible) should be their own nations at equal footing. Now the Security Council is security feudalism, political feudalism for those who have permanent seats protected by them. And they are used against us.

It should not be called the Security Council. It should be called the " Terror Council. "

You see, my brothers, that in our life, in our political life, that if the Security Council is used against us, then they go to the Security Council, they resort to the Security Council. If they have no need to use it against us, then they ignore the Security Council.

If the charter,  they have interests, an ax to grind to use against us, they respect the charter. They look for the seven chapters of the Security charter (inaudible). But if they want to violate the charter, they would ignore the charter as if it doesn't exist at all.

If the veto on the permanent seat is given to the one who has the power is injustice and terrorism that will not be accepted by us, and we should not live under the shadow of this injustice and this terror. Superpowers have interests, complicating (ph) interests, and they use the interests, they use the (inaudible), they use the power of the United Nations to protect their interests. And these terrorized and intimidated the Third World. The Third World is terrified and being terrorized and living under the fear of terror.

The Security Council ever since it was established in 1949 did not provide us with security, but provided us, on the contrary, terror and sanctions. It is used against us only. For this reason, we are not committed to adhere to the Security Council resolutions after this speech of the fortieth anniversary.

Sixty-four wars took place broke out against the war (ph) against the world, against small (inaudible). That it is fighting between small countries or aggression in wars against by superpowers against countries, big countries against us. And United Nations or the Security Council did not take any actions to stop these wars and aggressions in violation of the charter of the United Nations against small nations and small peoples. And the General Assembly will vote for these historic resolutions.

Either we continue together in one nations or we go into break into two equal nations, have its own general assembly, its own security council belonging to it, where they have equal footing, standing on equal footing or and the big countries who have the permanent seats, who have their rights, will stay in their own councils, whether there are four or three, as they wish (inaudible).

And they should exercise veto against themselves, and this is not of our interest.

And if they want to stay in permanent seats, OK, that's OK, but permanent is a threat for (inaudible) but we shall never stay under the supervision or the control of the veto and the right of veto to given countries. We are not (inaudible) to give we are not fool to give the right of a veto to big powers to use us, and we are treated like second class and like despised nations. We have not decided that these are big nations, (inaudible) nations, respected nations. These are the nations of the world which represent 190 countries.

We know that now ignoring the resolutions of the Security Council is now  though it is injustice, and it is only used against us. It is not used against the big countries who have the permanent seats or those countries who have the right of veto. They never use any resolution against them. In the countries, it is used against us.

So, any resolutions taken against us, it has become a travesty of the United Nations, and it has become wars and violations of independent states authorities (ph) and committing war crimes and genocides. And these are all in violation of the Security Council, even though there is a Security Council, and nobody cares about the Security Council and even though now each now, each country has each (inaudible) community have become security councils, establishing its own security councils and with the security councils in its own formation.

Now it has the Security Council (inaudible) has become isolated. The African Union has already established MASS (ph), which is the peace and security for Africa, and the European Union has already established the security council. The (inaudible) already establishing its own security councils. America will have its own concerns, non-alignment (ph). One hundred twenty countries will have its own peace and security council.

This means that we have already lost the trust in the Security Council, which have not provided us with security. And now that's why we are creating regional peace securities or regional security councils. We are not committed to obey the rules or the resolutions of the security councils in this formation because it is undemocratic, unjust, and no one can force us to be a member of the security councils and to obey or adhere to resolutions or all of this given by Security Council in its composition as it is right now.

Now, brothers, there is no respect to the United Nations. No regard to the General Assembly, which constitutes (ph) actually the real substantive (inaudible), and which  it has no decisions that is abiding. The International Court of Justice, it is a judicial international body, and resolutions only implemented against the small countries, the small nations. And big countries are rejected to be implemented against the big countries. There are resolutions or court orders taken against these big countries, but they have been refused to be implemented against them.

The International the IAEA (ph), an important one in the United Nations, are not big countries are not responsible for it, or are not under control. And we have discovered that this is only used against us. It is a (inaudible) against us. You told us, this is an international one, so if it is an international one, then all the countries of the world should be under jurisdictions of this one.  If it's not international, then we close the door and arrive from this now, from this speech, we shall close the door, and we should not accept it.

And adopt a (inaudible) president of the General Assembly. He will talk to the director of the Baradei (ph) or the (inaudible). They will ask him, do you inspect the nuclear supplies of all? Do you supervise the increase of this nuclear storage? Then if he says, yes, then OK, then we accept that we'll be under control. But if he says that we cannot go to these countries who have the nuclear powers, and I cannot have any jurisdiction, then we should close the door, and we not accept it to be under its control.

For your information, I told Baradei when we had the problem (inaudible) nuclear bomb, and predecessor, I called them and I told them, Mr. Baradei, the agreements to increase to decrease the nuclear supplies between the superpowers, is it under control? Is there any provisions that if it's in a country increased its nuclear heads, are you aware of that? He said to me, no. These big powers I cannot go so close to it. I cannot ask them. I cannot....  so, you are only coming to us???

I said that this is not an international organization. So, it is meant only for us. Security Council  against us. International  IAEA against us. International Court of Justice against us. And they (world powers) are free. This is not justice. This is not United Nations. This is rejected totally.

As regards Africa, Dr. (inaudible), if you want to reform  whether they reform the United Nations or not, and even before you take any historic decisions or vote against Africa, a need is now for now a permanent member seat in the Security Council because this is (inaudible). Even if we are not talking about the United Nations reform, Africa was colonized, was isolated, was persecuted, was usurped (ph), was treated like animals, was treated like slaves, was treated colonies, was colonized, was put under the trusteeship.

These countries, the African Union deserves a permanent seat for the past. It's an outstanding bill to be paid, like (inaudible). And it has nothing to do with the United Nation reforms. This is a priority and high on the agenda for the General Assembly, and no one can say that the African Union does not deserve a permanent seat.

Who has the argument? Anyone can talk to me even right now or argue with me. Any proof that the African Union does not deserve a permanent seat or that the African continent does not deserve a permanent seat. No one can argue, or no one can refute what I am saying.

It is also for voting for the General Assembly for compensation to countries who were colonized. And why? So that no more repetition of colonizations and no more usurpation and stealing of the wealth of the people.

And why the Africans should go to Europe? Why do Africans go to Europe? Why do Asians go to Europe? Why do Latin American people go to Europe? Because Europe was colonized by they took the mines (ph), the wealth, all the resources of Africa, of Asia, of Latin America. And they took all the oil, the fruit, the vegetables and the stock and the people, and they used them.

Now, the new generation, the African generations whether it is Asian, whether it is Latin America or it is in Africa, now they are looking for these ones which have been usurped and stolen. Now, when I stop one African (inaudible) going to Europe (inaudible), I told them where are you going? They told me, I'm going to take my usurped wealth. If you bring my reserved wealth, then I don't go. I stop.

Who can bring back the wealth that was taken to me? Make a decision to bring all these resources and wealth so that no more immigration from the Philippines to Latin America, to Mauritius, to India. Let us have the wealth that was taken from us and looted from us. Africa deserves compensation  trillion $7.7, $7.77 trillion.

That's the compensation Africa deserves from the countries who colonized Africa. Africa will call for that.

And if you don’t give us this amount, 7.77, the Africans will go to where you have taken these trillions. They have the right. They have to follow. Bring the money back. And then they can be (inaudible).

No Libyan immigration to Italy, even though Libya's so (inaudible). Why there is no Libyan immigration to Italy? Because Italy (inaudible) compensation for the Libyan people (inaudible) and accepted the compensations and signed the (inaudible), a treaty, an agreement with the Italian with Libyan, and it was endorsed by the Italian parliament, and accepted that the colonization was wrong, and we should not be repeated again.

And Italy would not accept to be attacked whether by air, sea against the Libyan people and that Libya will compensate for the next 20 years, will pay a quarter of billions and will build hospitals for the Libyans who are lost their members of their hands or their fingers because of the mines during the Second World War when the mines were laid upon the Libyan land.

Italy made apology and was sorry and said that it will never be a country will occupy other country, the territories of other countries. And it was  Italy when it was a kingdom and it was Italy during the fascist regime. And Italy has done a glorified thing and a civilized thing and should be commended during the Berlusconi and even the predecessor to Berlusconi did their own contribution until we achieved this result.

The Third World calls for compensation, why? So that we don't have any more colonizations, so we don't have a repeat of colonizations. And so that no country will be big and will covet (ph) to colonize another country. So that this country will know that there will be compensation, and will not go on (inaudible). Colonization should be eliminated, and countries should pay compensations who have done damage to the peoples during the colonization area, and they should be compensated for the damage and the suffering that they have inflicted during their colonial power.

The other point I would hope that we have to face patiently but before I say this point, it’s is rather sensitive to a certain extent. There are sentences between two brackets I would like to shed some light upon and mention. We as a matter of fact that we Africans are happy, proud, that one son of Africans governs the United States of America, of Africa. This is a historic event. One day that the black doesn't go where the white go and cannot be in a bus where the white is. Now, the American people, the black African Kenyan, young  voted for him and made him a president. This is a great thing, and we are proud of that.

You are the beginning of a change. He did go for a change. But as far as I'm concerned, Obama is a glimpse in the dark for the four years or the next eight years, and I’m afraid that we may go back to square one. How can you guarantee America after Obama? Can you guarantee after Obama how America will be governed?

No one can guarantee America. We are content and happy if Obama can stay forever as the president of the United States of America.

The speech made by Obama just before me, it is completely different when (ph) an American president that we have witnessed or that we have lived with or  the former Americans, they used to say, and I quote, they say, We shall send you the all the weapons. We shall send you the road clusters and the sandstorms and the rolling thunder, and we shall send you the poisonous roses to the Libyan children.

This was the logic. The American presidents used to say to us, they shall terrorize us. We shall send you the like rolling thunder like the one was sent to Vietnam. We shall send you rolling thunder the same way that was sent to Vietnam, and the sandstorm like it was sent to Iraq.

We shall send you the night (ph) as it was sent to Egypt in 1956 even though America was against the night operations. And we shall send you the poisonous rose that Reagan sent to the Libyan children. Can you imagine the president of a permanent country, a big country has a permanent seat at the Security Council, has a right to veto? We thought that America will protect us and send us peace.

What is it? These are lesser-guided bombs sent to us according to the carried on the F-1 airplanes. This was the logic. And we shall lead the world, and we shall punish anyone who anyone whether they like it or not. We shall punish anyone who will be against us. Now, what our son Obama said is completely different today. He's calling for the seriously, for discardment (ph) or the deproliferation (ph) of nuclear weapons, and we should applaud that. America cannot solve the problem alone, and the whole world should come together.

And he said that the position we are at now, we should not continue. Now we are meet (ph) and making a speech it should not be like that. We accept it. We applaud it. And then the United Nations also we come here to United Nations to talk against each other. It's true that we come here, we should have equal footing and equal unions and equal associations, and he says that democracy we should not be imposed from outside.

So, the reason there is the American president who recently says that we should impose democracy against Iraq and against so on, so on, so on. He did say that this is an (inaudible) of everybody. This was lost (ph) words, and what we hear right now is the true sense of the word when he said that democracy cannot be imposed from outside.

So, we have to be cautious, and before I just say my sensitive remark or the whole the whole world has so many problems (ph).

Shh, whole world, shh, listen, listen. World of so many problems (ph). Should be like that, should we have so many problems (ph)? Can't we nations on equal footing? Can't we  let's have an answer.

Anyone have an answer that it is better to have a world of so many polarities? Why can’t we have equal standing? Should we have a patriarch (ph)? Should we have bombs? Should we have guns? Is it and this is why should we have a world of so many polarity?

We reject - we accept - we don't - we do not accept that a world living not equal, big and small. The other point that is sensitive, the quarters of the United Nations. Please, can I have your attention? Please, can I have your attention?

All of you came across the Atlantic, crossing the Atlantic oceans, the Asian continent or the African continent to reach this place. Why? Is this the Jerusalem? Is this the Vatican? Is this Mecca? All of you are tired, having jet lag, suffering from jet lag, tired, had sleepless night, and very tired and physically speaking, you are very low. One just arrived now, flying 20 hours, and then you want him to make a speech and talk about this.

All of you are asleep. All of you are tired. It is clear that all of you are lacking the energy because of having to travel a long journey. Why do that? Your country now, some of our countries are in nighttime, and they are asleep, and now you should be asleep because your biological hour or your biological mind is accustomed to be asleep at this time. I wake up 4:00 at New York time, before dawn, because in Libya it is 11:00 in the morning.

Because when I wake up at 11:00, I am supposed to be daytime. At 4:00 I'm awake. Why do you think? Why do you think, why? Think about it. If this was put in 1945, should we keep it up to now? Why can't we think about a place that is in the comfortable?

The other point, America, the hosting country, that bears the consequences  the expenses and the looking after the headquarters and the looking after the peace and security of heads of state who come here, very strict, and they spend a lot of money and New York and all of America being very tired. I want to relieve America from this hardship. We should thank America, and we say to America, thank you for all the trouble that incurred upon itself. And we say thank you to America. We want to help America. We want to make America secure and New York secure, and we should not have the responsibility of looking after the security.

Perhaps somebody would do  any terrorists will make an explosion or a bomb of an aircraft or a president or an American, and then this place is a target by  targeted by the Al Qaida. This very same place, the same building. And if it was and why? Because on the 11th of September, it did not hit it. That was beyond their power.

And the next target, that would be  and I'm not saying this out of the record that we have tens of members of Al Qaida being detained in the Libyan prisons and (inaudible), very scary. And this makes America lives in under tension, and perhaps you never know what will happen.

Perhaps America will be targeted again by a rocket, or by perhaps tens of heads of state will die.

We want America, to relieve America from this worry, and we shall take the place to a place where it is not targeted. Now, after 50 years, should be taken to another part of the hemisphere. Fifty years in the western hemisphere. Now for the next 50 years should be in the eastern hemisphere or in the middle hemisphere, like this by rotation. Now 64 years now, now we have extra 14 years over the 50 years that the quarters should have been taken from this.

This is not any insult to America. This is a service to America. We should thank America. This was possible in 1945, but we should not accept it now. And, of course, this is also put for vote in the General Assembly. Only in the General Assembly, because Article 23 of the of the agreement 64, it says that  (inaudible).

After the America has the right to make any tight securities because America is targeted by the terrorists and by Al Qaida. America has the right to be to take all the security measures. We are not blaming America for that. But we don't tolerate these measures. We don't have to come to New York. And we don't have to be submitted to all these measures. One president told me that your copilot should not come to America because there is restrictions. He said, how can I come  how can I cross the Atlantic without a copilot? Why, why? He doesn't have to. He doesn't have to come here.

When another president complained that his guard cannot  his honor guard cannot come because there is some misunderstanding in his name and granting him a visa. He came  one other president came and said, my own doctor, he couldn't get a visa, and he could not come to America because he was not granted an entry visa. You see, the security measures very strict.

And, of course, if there is any problem that a country has with America, then they will put restrictions for the movement of the member delegations like in Guantanamo. Is this a member state of the United Nations or he is a prisoner in the Guantanamo camp that he cannot allow free movement?

So, this is what is submitted for voting for the United  for the General Assemblies. The transformation or the moving of the headquarters. If 51 percent say, then we come to the second vote. To the middle of the globe or to the eastern part of the globe. If we say that we have to take the headquarters, then certain the place is (inaudible). Whether the middle  whether the center hemisphere. Why don't we go to (inaudible). If you go to 1,000 (inaudible), and no one can blame you? And no  you can come even without a visa.

Once you come with a president, it's a secure country (ph).

We are not going to restrict you to 100 or 500 meters, and Libya has no hostile actions against anybody. And again, I think we'll be in the same positions. And if the vote, it say that we shall have to take the vote to the eastern part, then it will be Delhi or Beijing in China, the capital of China or the capital city of India.

And this is logic, I believe, my brothers. And I don't think there will be any objection to that. And then you will play  you will say that thank  you will thank me for this proposal for eliminating the suffering and the trouble of flying over 20 hours and 15 hours to come to this place, and no one can blame America, can say that America will reduce its contribution to the United Nations.

No, nobody should have this bad thought.

America, I'm sure, will be committed to its international obligations, and America will not be angry, and America will thank you for alleviating the hardship of America. And America should thank us for taking all the hardship and all the restrictions for the  this, plus  even though this place is targeted by terrorists. Then we come to the  we come to the issues that will be taken by the General Assembly.

Either we have to try ourselves. Either we do the right thing, or whether we have a new meeting. This is not a normal meeting. This is not a normal gathering.

This is  even my son, Obama said that. He said that this is a historical one. This is not a normal gathering. This is not a normal one.

Now, the wars that took place after the establishment of the Second World War, why did it happen? Where was the Security Council? Where was the charter? Where was the United Nations?

There should be investigations, and there should be court orders. And why there was massacres? We start with the Korean War.

This was taken after the establishment of the United Nations.

How a war broke out and millions of people fell victims, and perhaps there was even a nuclear  a nuclear  the world was about  the world was about to witness a nuclear war. And those who are responsible, and those who caused the war should be tried and should pay the consequence.

Then we come to the Suez Canal war in 1956. The file should be opened. Why three countries who have permanent seats in the Security Councils enjoyed the right, the veto of the Security Council's attack, a member state in this General Assembly?

A country that is Egypt in this case, that was a sovereign state, was attacked and the army was destroyed. And thousands of Egyptian people were killed, and towns, villages were destroyed.

How could such a thing happen during the era of the United Nations? And how can we guarantee that such a thing will not be repeated unless we redeem the past?

And this is a very dangerous thing. The Suez Canal war, the Korean War, we should open the files.

And then we come to the Vietnam War. Three million victims of the Vietnam War. During 11 days, bombs were used more than the bombs used during the whole war. And during the Second World War, all the shells and the bombs that were used, or bombed during the four years of the war, the bombs that were used in the 12 days were more than.

This was a fierce war. And this war took place after the establishment of the United Nations. And we decided that there would be no wars.

This is the future of the mankind, and we cannot keep quiet. How can we be how can we be safe? How can we feel accomplished? How can we feel complacent, I mean. This is the future of the world and this is the General Assembly of the world, and we have to make sure that such wars will not be repeated in the future.

Then Panama was attacked, even though it was an independent state, a member state of the General Assembly, of the United Nations. And 4,000 peoples were killed, and the president of this country was taken as a prisoner and was taken put in prison.

And Noriega should be released, and we should open the file. And how we give the right to a country that is a member state of the United Nations to go and wage a war against a country and take the president of such a country and take him as a criminal and put him in prison? Who would accept that?

This may be repeated. And we should not be quiet, and we should make investigations, and we should  each one of us may face the same destiny. Each member state of us may face the same, especially if this aggression is made by a member state that is has a member seat in the Security Council and supposed to look and maintain the world peace security.

Then we have the Grenada war. This country was attacked, was invaded even though it was a member state, by 7,000 - 5,000 warships and using 7,000 troops. It is the smallest country in the world.

And after the establishment of the Security Council, after the establishment of the United Nations, and the (inaudible). And the president of this country, Maurice Bishop, was assassinated. How this can be done with impunity? This is a tragedy.

And then how can we guarantee that the United Nations is good or not, that the Security Council is good enough? Can we be safe and happy about our future or not? Can we trust the Security Council or not? Can we trust the United Nations or not?

Then we have to check and investigate the bombing of Somalia.

Somalia was a member state of the United Nations. It is an independent country. And (inaudible).

Why? Who allowed that? Who gave the green light for such a country to attack  to be attacked?

Then the Yugoslav war. No country that is peaceful country like Yugoslavia, that was built  that was built step by step, piece by piece, after it was destroyed by Hitler. We destroy it as if we are doing the same job like Hitler.

Hitler  after the death of Tito  and he built this country step by step and brick by brick, and then we come and dismember it for imperialist personal interests. How can we be satisfied? How can we be happy? If a peaceful country like Yugoslavia faced this tragedy, the General Assembly should make investigations and the General Assembly should decide who should be tried for the (inaudible).

Then we come to the Iraqi war, the mother of all evils. The United Nations also should investigate.

The General Assembly presided by (inaudible) should be investigated by the General Assembly, the invasion of Iraq itself. This was in violation of the United Nations charter without any justifications made by several countries who have member seats in the Security Council.

Iraq is an independent country, member in this General Assembly. How this country is attacked and how this country  how we have already read in the general  in the  in the charter that the United Nations should have interfered and stopped.

We have come to General Assembly, and we have resorted to the General Assembly. We said that we should go to the General Assembly and use the charter for the checking (ph). We were against this invasion of Kuwait, but Arab countries fought with foreign countries in the name of the General Assembly with foreign countries. In the first place, the U.N. charter was respected. And the second time we wanted to use to it stop the war against Iraq, no one used the U.N. charter. And it was discarded in the dustbin.

Why? General Assembly should investigate. Why? Why there was any reason to invade Iraq? Because it is mysterious, ambiguous, and we may face the same destiny. Why did we invade Iraq?

The invasion in itself is a serious violation of the U.N. charter. I mean, the invasion itself, per se, is wrong. Then the total massacre, or the genocide. More than 1.5 million Iraqi people were killed.

We want the we want to take this file and we want to  those who have committed the general mass murder against the Iraqi people should be tried. Yes.

Make it easy for (inaudible) to go to be tried, or Bashir to be tried. Or it is easy for (inaudible) to be tried, or Noriega to be tried. That is an easy job to be done.

OK. What about those who have committed mass murder against Iraqis? Cannot be tried? Cannot go to the  we should not accept it. Either it is meant for all of us, big or small, or we should not accept it and refuse it.

If anyone who commits a crime and can be tried, we are not animals in the livestock, or in  that we slaughter  we have the right. We are ready to fight. We are ready to defend ourselves. And we have the right to live dignified under the sun, on the Earth, and they have already tested us, and we can put up to test.

The other thing, how come that prisoners of war of Iraq can be sentenced to death? Then when Iraq was invaded and the president of the Iraqi war was caught, it was made as a prisoner of war. He should not be tried. He should not be hanged. And after the end of war, he should be released.

So, we want to know why the prisoner of war have been tried or should have been tried. Who sentenced to death the president of Iraq? Is there an answer to that?

We know who tried  who tried him, the name of the judge, the identity of the judge. Who put on the sacrifice day the rope around the neck and killed  or hanged the president? People we don’t know, they have a mask over their face.

If this is a civilized war, these are prisoners of war under civilized countries, under the international law. How a member of a government and the president of a country should be sentenced to death and hanged, do they have the right? Are they legal people? Are they a member of a judicial system?

Do you know what other people say  or what the people say? People say that the American president and the president  the British president are wearing the masks, and they have already put to death the president of Iraq.

This is  why don't they uncover their face? Why don't we know their ranks? Why don’t we know, is he an officer or a judge, a doctor?

Who is he? How come a president of a country, a member state, is sentenced to death and killed? We don'tknow the identity.

Those countries, the implementation the United Nations has the duty to answer these questions. Who have exercised or implemented the death sentence? Those foreigners, they should have the legal status (ph), and they should have the legal status (ph), and we should know the identity of the presence of the doctor, and all the legal procedures should be, even for a layman, let alone as the president of a country, a member state in the United Nations to be sentenced in such a way and put to death in such a way.

This is the Iraqi war.

Point number three in the Iraqi war is the Abu Ghraib situation, which is a disgrace to mankind. I know America made the investigations for this scandal, or the authorities under the Americans, but the United Nations also should not forget it. The United Nations should the General Assembly of the United Nations should investigate and look into this matter.

The Abu Ghraib decisions, the prisoners of war who were prosecuted there and who were badly treated, and dogs were used on them, and men were made love to. And no one has done this before in previous wars, sodomy, and this is unprecedented. No one  no previous aggressions, or no  or aggressors and prisoners of war, there are  there are soldiers, and they are raped in prisons.

Then by a member state of the Security Council, this Security Council, this is against civilization. And this is a humane kind, and we should not keep quiet. We should know the facts.

And up to now, a quarter of a million prisoners are still  men and women are in Abu Ghraib. They are badly treated and persecuted and raped. We should never forget, and we should open an investigation for that.

Then Afghanistan. Then we have the Afghani war.

There should also be an investigation for the Afghani war. Why are we against Taliban? Why are we against Afghanistan? Who's Taliban?

If Taliban wants to make a religious state, OK, like the Vatican.

Does the Vatican pose any threat to us? No it is a very peaceful, religious state.
If the Afghans want to establish an Islamic emirate let it be like the Vatican. Who said the taleban are the enemy and has to be struck by the armies? Is bin Laden an Afghan. Is he a taleban. Bin Laden is not from the taleban and not from Afghanistan.

The terrorists who struck New York? Are they Afghans? Are they from the taleban? No they are not Afghani and they are not from the taleban. So why were Iraq and Afghanistan targeted?

If I want to deceive my American and English friends I would not tell them this. But I would encourage them and tell them go on, send more troops to Afghanistan and send further troops until they drown in a blood bath because they will achieve no result in Afghanistan or in Iraq.

You have seen what happened in Iraq. That took place even though Iraq is a wide open desert. Then what do you think of Afghanistan with these mighty mountains. No one could defeat it till the hereafter. They are just hitting the rock. They will scratch it but they will not demolish it. Continue the war in Afghanistan in Iraq. But I want to save them. I want to say these hapless nations. America and the other countries that fight in Afghanistan and Iraq. We are saying you have to leave Afghanistan for the Afghanis. You have leave Iraq for the Iraqis. Leave them even if they fight each other. They are free to do so. The civil war took place even in the USA. Nobody interfered. The civil war also took place in Spain and in China and in many parts of the world and nobody interfered. If it is a civil war let it go on. Leave it for the Iraqis and for the Afghans to fight each other, they are free.

Who says that if the taleban rule Afghanistan they will become a threat? Do the taleban have any intercontinental missiles? The airliner that hit New York. Did it come from Afghanistan or Iraq. These airliners took off from Kennedy airport in New York. So why do we go and strike Afghanistan. They are not Afghans, not taleban, nor Iraqis. Why should we keep silent about these things. Those who keep silent regarding what is right is like a silent devil. We won't be silent devils. It is our right because we are keen on world peace. We are keen on the destiny of the world. We do not want to undermine humanity in this manner. Then after that Mr Ali Tereki, the general assembly has to launch investigations of the assassinations. You have to launch an investigation once again on the assassination of Patrice Lumumba. We want this recorded in our African history. How an African leader, an African liberator was assassinated. We want to establish who killed him and to record that for history so that our sons will learn history and they will known why Patrice Lumumba the hero of African-Congolese liberation was killed. Even after 50 years. And that act has to be denounced and those responsible have to be held accountable. This file has to be opened and we have to go back to the old documents.

Then we would like to know who killed the UN Secretary General Hamashold. Who bombed his aircraft in 1961, the same year in which Lumumba was killed. We want to know who bombed the plane of the UN Secretary General. We want to know who bombed it and who had an interest in that. Then we come to Kennedy's assassination in 1963. The UN General Assembly has to open the file of Kennedy's assassination. We want to know why he was killed. He was killed by someone called Lee Harvey and someone called Jack Rubbi killed Lee Harvey, the assasin of Kennedy.
We want to know why this Jack Rubbi, the Israeli, killed the assassin of Kennedy. And Jack Rubbi himself, the killer of Kennedy's killer also died in vague circumstances before his trial. We have to return to these files and we have to know.
What I know and what the world knows and what we studied in history is that Kennedy decided to inspect the Israeli Dimona reactor to see whether it has nuclear bombs. That is the reason he was got rid of. As long as the case in international in this manner and it concerns world peace and weapons of mass destruction we have to open investigations into the reason why Kennedy was killed. You should also open the file of Martin Luther King. This vicar who was a black activist and human rights campaigner and his assassination was a conspiracy. This file has to opened to establish who killed him and prosecute him.
And further more who killed Khalil Al Wazir the Palestinian Abu Jihad. He was attacked in a sovereign country, a member of this assembly. That is Tunisia where he stayed in its captial. But there was an attack by four warships, two submarines and two helicopters. The independence of that state was not respected as is clear from the assassination of Khalil Al Wazir.
How could we keep silent about such matters. If we keep silent there could be submarines coming to our countries and we could see warships coming to our coasts and pick up anyone they like without being held accountable.
Then we have the death of Abu Ayad. He was killed in very ambiguous circumstances. Then we have operations such as Al Fardan Operation and the Youth Spring Operation where Kamal Nasser was killed and where Kamal Udwan and Abu Yousif Al Najar were killed. These three Palestinians were killed in Lebanon which is a sovereign state and member of the UN General Assembly. We have to establish who killed them. We have to prosecute them so that such havoc is not repeated.

You would like to know as well why Maurice Bishop the head of Grenada was killed. We have tackled how Grenada was attacked, with how many war ships and troops. We said they launched an attack on Grenada with 7,000 soldiers, 15 war ships and scores of fighter planes. The president of this member state of the general assembly Maurice Bishop was killed. We can't keep silent about these crimes. Otherwise we will all become victims and sacrifices and every year it would be the turn of someone. We are not animals and we are not sacrifices. We are defending our existence, we are defending ourselves our sons and our grandsons. We are not afraid. We have the right to live. This globe is not only for the super powers. God created it for all of us. We should never live in humiliation.

 Then we have to open investigations into the evil massacres of Sabra and Shhatila which claimed 3,000 human victims. This village was under the protection of the occupying Israeli army. Then a massacre was carried out of Palestinian men, women and children. Most of them were Palestinians. How could we keep silent.
Lebanon is an independent state and a member of this assembly. The area of Sabra and Shatila was occupied and 3,000 were slaughtered. Then there is the massacre of Gaza in 2008. And for your information there were a thousand woman killed an injured. And 2,200 children. It means that there were 3,200 women and children only. Fifty educational centers belonging to the UN were demolished. Thirty non-governmental organizations were demolished including international relief organizations. Sixty clinics were demolished.. Forty doctors and nurses were killed while they were doing their humanitarian work. That was the outcome the Gaza massacre in December 2008.
The culprits are still living. They have to be prosecuted in the international criminal court. But if the International Criminal Court is only targeting the smaller states and Third World countries this is not right. Those culprits have to be tried in the court unless it was not international. Then we would not recognize it. If it is international everybody is subjected to it.
As long as the International Court of Justice is not respected and its rulings not implemented and as long as the International Atomic Energy Agency does not include all countries and the general assembly is doing nothing and the Security Council is monopolized then the United Nations is nothing. There is no United Nations. Then we come to piracy. This phenomenon may spread to all the seas. It could become a threat like terrorism. Let us tackle Somali piracy. I am telling you the Somalis are not pirates. The pirates are ourselves because we exploited all the fishing grounds. We undermined their livelihood. We undermined their economies and their regional waters.
All the ships of the world, whether from Libya, India, Japan or America exploited Somali waters and we are the aggressors. After the Somali state collapsed we came to pick up the remnants. The Somalis had to defend their marine wealth which is their food and the food of their children. Then they transformed themselves into pirates to defend themselves. They are not pirates. They only defend their livelihood. And now you are handling it in the wrong way. You are saying let us send warships to strike the Somalis. No. warships should go to strike the pirates who undermined the Somali wealth and resources. You have to strike the foreign fishing boats.

Anyhow I held a meeting with the pirates. I told them I would make an agreement between them and the world. The world has to respect the Somali economy area up to 200 nautical miles according to the law of the seas. All the marine wealth in that area belongs to the Somalis. The world has to respect this economic area. This is first.
Then second, all the countries should abstain from dumping hazardous waste in the Somali economic area of the Somali coast and in return the Somalis will abstain from attacking ships. We will draft this agreement and we will present it to the UN General Assembly. That is the solution. The solution is not more strikes against the Somalis.
What is worse is that their warships are preventing the Somalis from going into the sea for fishing. This is the wrong handling, this is the wrong approach. Our way of tackling terrorism is wrong.

 Our handling of matters is actually wrong. If the vaccination for swine flu is produced and there could be more flus of God or flus of fish then the factories that belong to the intelligence operate and they sell at a high price. This is trade. They produce a virus and they spread it across the world so that capitalist companies gain money from selling vaccines. This is shameful. The vaccines are not to be sold. Medicines are not to be sold. You have to read the Green Book. It does not allow the selling of medicines. If we say the medicines are free and the vaccines are free and no viruses are spread because it is they who produce these viruses in order to produce vaccines. That is how capitalist companies work. This is the wrong approach. You have to declare that medicines are free and not for sale. Even if the viruses are real we should not sell the vaccines. They have to be offered for free.

All these matters are submitted in files to be discussed by the UN General Assembly. It has nothing to do but this work.
Then we have the Ottowa agreement which bans the production, the shipment or sale of mines etc.
This is wrong. The mines are not offensive weapons. They are defensive. The mines do not move. They do not attack. It remains wherever it is planted. That means you went to it. Why did you go to it? I would like to plant mines on the borders of my country because you are aggressing my country. Let your hand or leg be amputated. I urge you to review this Ottowa agreement. This appeal could be seen in the internet, in the website Al Qadhafi talks. This agreement has to be revoked or amended.
They want to deprive us even from the mines which are anti personnel. If I want to plant a mine in front of my home or farm then this is my way of defense. It is not offensive. You may cancel the atomic weapons the missiles and inter-continental missiles.

As for the Palestinian cause the two-state solution is impossible. I urge you not to speak about it. The only solution is one democratic state for Jews and for Muslims for Palestinians and Christians and all others like Lebanon. The two state-solution is not practical and impossible. There can be no two neighboring states which are to much overlapping. Any division will inevitably fail.
Firstly the two states are not neighbors but are overlapping from all aspects, population, geography and so forth. There are no states. You can’t establish a dividing no man’s land between them because it doesn't exist.
The West Bank has half a million Israeli settlers. The so-called Israel has a million Palestinian settlers. How can we establish two states. The world has to go to impose one democratic state without any religious, nationalist or linguistic bigotry. Bigotry is reactionary and it is time is well over. These are thoughts of the guard. The ideas of the Third World War. The ideas of men like Yasser Arafat and Sharon. All these are over. The new generation wants one democratic state. We have to exert every effort to impose on them one state where all people co-exist.
Look at the Palestinian youth. Look at Israeli youth. They want peace. They want to live in one state. This is the way to end this headache which undermines and poisons the whole world. The White Book has the solution for Israel. You have to consider it, Ali Al Treiki. (Gaddafi Throw a book to President of UN at this point)

The Arabs have no animosity with the Israelis. They are cousins and they live with them in peace. Arabs have no future. Arabs have no future. The future is Israfil (Angel). I tell you again, our future is Israfil (Angel). The Palestinian refugees must return and they have to live peacefully in one state. It is you who make the holocaust for them. You burned them down in the chambers of gas in Europe. It is you who hate the Jews but we don't.
We have accommodated them, we protected them since Roman days and since they were expelled from Andulsia. We also protected them in the days of Hitler and from the gas chambers of Hitler. It is ourselves who protected them and it is you who expelled them. You expelled them and told them go and fight the Arabs.
Let us expose this reality. We are not enemies of the Jews. They are our cousins. The Jews will need the Arabs one day but the Arabs will not protect them as they did in the past. Let us have a look at what Tito did. What Hadrin did. What Edward 1 did and what Hitler did to the Jews. You hate them and you are anti-Semitic.

As for the issue of Kashmir in short in has no solution unless it becomes one independent state to buffer between India and Pakistan. It will become neither Indian nor Pakistani and the conflict will be over. As for Darfur I hope that the aid you sent to international aid organizations are transferred to other projects, development, industrial and agricultural. Darfur is now living in peace and there is no war. It is you who blew it up soas to interfere and establish a foothold for the sake of oil and you sacrificed the people of Darfur.

Why do I tackle all these issues? It is because we have to investigate these issues. Previously you have submitted the case of Al Hariri, God have mercy on him, to the United Nations. Why did you do so? Is it because you wanted to sacrifice the blood of Al Hariri and you sold the body of Al Hariri in order to settle scores with Syria. If it not so why did Lebanon, which is an independent state with a judiciary laws and police and everything and could determine who the culprits are. But in this matter it is not the culprits who are wanted. What is wanted is the settlement of scores with Syria and sacrificing the issue of Al Hariri and we will get nowhere in the issue of Al Hariri.
Therefore all the cases of Abu, Khalil Al Wazir, Kennedy, Lumumba, Hammershold should be transferred to the United Nations as the others were.At any rate the UN General Assembly is chaired by Libya and this is its right. The work that could be done by Libya is to help the world in moving from one phase to another, from this world which is lost, bitter, shameful, terrorised and threatened to move to a more human world where there is peace and tolerance.
I will follow up this work with the General Assembly and with Ali Al Teriki and with the UN Secretary General because we will not be complacent and we will not be submissive regarding the fate of humanity.

Humanity has to struggle in order to live in peace. The struggle by the Third World and the smaller states, 100 of them in order to live in dignity and in freedom is a continued struggle and it has to continue till the end. Peace and blessings.

=========================

Muammar Gaddafi
Hero of the Islamic World who ripped up the UN Charter at the UN platform - 2009

http://metaexistence.org/gaddafispeech.htm

=========================

==================================================

  KASUS SURIAH

 

 

 

Mendukung Gerakan Perlawanan (Muqawamah) melawan ISRAEL

Pemimpin HAMAS dan Bashar AlAssad

Menjalin Hubungan dengan Pihak yang ANTI NEO KOLONIALISME

 

 

 

Dekat dengan Tokoh Ulama Sunni

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mendukung Maulud Nabi sebagai Hari Besar Nasional Suriah

 

 

 

(Source)